Literature DB >> 31328802

The increasing use of shave biopsy for diagnosing invasive melanoma in Australia.

Sara L de Menezes1,2, John W Kelly1,2, Rory Wolfe2, Helen Farrugia3, Victoria J Mar1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in the choice of skin biopsy technique for assessing invasive melanoma in Victoria, and to examine the impact of partial biopsy technique on the accuracy of tumour microstaging.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional review of Victorian Cancer Registry data on invasive melanoma histologically diagnosed in Victoria during 2005, 2010, and 2015. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: 400 patients randomly selected from each of the three years, stratified by final tumour thickness: 200 patients with thin melanoma (< 1.0 mm), 100 each with intermediate (1.0-4.0 mm) and thick melanoma (> 4.0 mm). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Partial and excisional biopsies, as proportions of all skin biopsies; rates of tumour base transection and T-upstaging, and mean tumour thickness underestimation following partial biopsy.
RESULTS: 833 excisional and 337 partial diagnostic biopsies were undertaken. The proportion of partial biopsies increased from 20% of patients in 2005 to 36% in 2015 (P < 0.001); the proportion of shave biopsies increased from 9% in 2005 to 20% in 2015 (P < 0.001), with increasing rates among dermatologists and general practitioners. Ninety-four of 175 shave biopsies (54%) transected the tumour base; wide local excision subsequently identified residual melanoma in 65 of these cases (69%). Twenty-one tumours diagnosed by shave biopsy (12%) were T-upstaged. With base-transected shave biopsies, tumour thickness was underestimated by a mean 2.36 mm for thick, 0.48 mm for intermediate, and 0.07 mm for thin melanomas.
CONCLUSION: Partial biopsy, particularly shave biopsy, was increasingly used for diagnosing invasive melanoma between 2005 and 2015. Shave biopsy has a high rate of base transection, reducing the accuracy of tumour staging, which is crucial for planning appropriate therapy, including definitive surgery and adjuvant therapy.
© 2019 AMPCo Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Cytopathology; Diagnostic tests and procedures; Guidelines as topic; Immunotherapies; Melanoma; Pathology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31328802     DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  4 in total

1.  Base Transection with Shaves: An Avoidable Shortcoming : Reply to Impact of Shave Biopsy on Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hilary Brown; Thomas Pitney; James Muir
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Transcriptomic analysis reveal the responses of dendritic cells to VDBP.

Authors:  Biwei Cao; Tao Wen; Meng Wei; Yuan Xiong; Wan Liu; Li Zhu; Jing Zhou
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 3.  Impact of Shave Biopsy on Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Omid Ahmadi; Moushumi Das; Behzad Hajarizadeh; Jon A Mathy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group.

Authors:  Aaron S Farberg; Justin W Marson; Alex Glazer; Graham H Litchman; Ryan Svoboda; Richard R Winkelmann; Nicholas Brownstone; Darrell S Rigel
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-03-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.