Literature DB >> 31328129

Mechanical Proofreading: A General Mechanism to Enhance the Fidelity of Information Transfer Between Cells.

Joshua M Brockman1, Khalid Salaita1,2.   

Abstract

The cells and receptors of the immune system are mechanically active. Single molecule force spectroscopy, traction force microscopy, and molecular tension probe measurements all point to the importance of piconewton (pN) molecular forces in immune function. For example, forces enhance the ability of a T cell to discriminate between nearly identical antigens. The role of molecular forces at these critical immune recognition junctions is puzzling because mechanical forces generally facilitate bond dissociation, potentially increasing the difficulty for a receptor to recognize its cognate antigen. The advantage molecular forces confer in the process of immune recognition is not clear. Why would cells expend energy to exert force on the critical, but tenuous bonds that mediate immune surveillance? Do molecular forces provide some advantage to the immune system? The premise of this review is that molecular forces provide a specificity advantage to immune cells. Inspired by the recent discovery that receptor forces regulate immune signaling in T cells and B cells, we dub this notion "mechanical proofreading," akin to more classic kinetic proofreading models. During the process of mechanical proofreading, cells exert pN receptor forces on receptor-ligand interactions, deliberately increasing the energy cost of the immune recognition process in exchange for increased specificity of signaling. Here, we review the role of molecular forces in the immune system and suggest how these forces may facilitate mechanical proofreading to increase the specificity of the immune response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune recognition; Mechanical Proofreading; Mechanobiology; Molecular forces; T cell activation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31328129      PMCID: PMC6641563          DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Phys        ISSN: 2296-424X


  6 in total

1.  T Cell Reprogramming Against Cancer.

Authors:  Samuel G Katz; Peter M Rabinovich
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

2.  Live-cell super-resolved PAINT imaging of piconewton cellular traction forces.

Authors:  Joshua M Brockman; Hanquan Su; Aaron T Blanchard; Yuxin Duan; Travis Meyer; M Edward Quach; Roxanne Glazier; Alisina Bazrafshan; Rachel L Bender; Anna V Kellner; Hiroaki Ogasawara; Rong Ma; Florian Schueder; Brian G Petrich; Ralf Jungmann; Renhao Li; Alexa L Mattheyses; Yonggang Ke; Khalid Salaita
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Mechanical Regulation of Transcription: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Kaustubh Wagh; Momoko Ishikawa; David A Garcia; Diana A Stavreva; Arpita Upadhyaya; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  Mechanically Triggered Hybridization Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Yuxin Duan; Roxanne Glazier; Alisina Bazrafshan; Yuesong Hu; Sk Aysha Rashid; Brian G Petrich; Yonggang Ke; Khalid Salaita
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 16.823

5.  Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals Distinctions in Key Biophysical Parameters of αβ T-Cell Receptors Compared with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Directed at the Same Ligand.

Authors:  Debasis Banik; Maryam Hamidinia; Joanna Brzostek; Ling Wu; Hannah M Stephens; Paul A MacAry; Ellis L Reinherz; Nicholas R J Gascoigne; Matthew J Lang
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.888

6.  Multiple actin networks coordinate mechanotransduction at the immunological synapse.

Authors:  Daniel Blumenthal; Janis K Burkhardt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.