Literature DB >> 3132758

International experience with NORPLANT and NORPLANT-2 contraceptives.

I Sivin1.   

Abstract

Experience encompassing more than 20,000 woman-years of use of NORPLANT capsules and 6,000 woman-years of trials of NORPLANT-2 rods is reviewed. Implant contraception repeatedly has been associated with low pregnancy rates and high continuation rates through five full years of use. Weight has proved to be a factor related to effectiveness. Women weighing less than 50 kg experienced cumulative five-year pregnancy rates well below 1 per 100, whereas the overall cumulative rate has been 3.5 per 100. Medical events reported during use that have led to discontinuation are analyzed from four large data sets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Body Weight; Contraception; Contraception Continuation--statistics; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Implants--contraindications; Contraceptive Implants--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--contraindications; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Diseases; Evaluation; Family Planning; Fecundity; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Menstruation Disorders; Pearl's Formula; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy Rate; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Signs And Symptoms; Use-effectiveness; World

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3132758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  14 in total

1.  Health authority commissioning for quality in contraception services.

Authors:  M Newman; M Bardsley; D Morgan; B Jacobson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

Review 2.  Noncontraceptive health benefits of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Who is a candidate for Norplant?

Authors:  S A Ballagh; D R Mishell
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-06

Review 4.  Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.

Authors:  J Power; R French; F Cowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

5.  Long acting methods of contraception.

Authors:  L Mascarenhas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-16

6.  The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods.

Authors:  J Trussell; J A Leveque; J D Koenig; R London; S Borden; J Henneberry; K D LaGuardia; F Stewart; T G Wilson; S Wysocki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Biomedical Imaging in Implantable Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Haoyan Zhou; Christopher Hernandez; Monika Goss; Anna Gawlik; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.465

8.  Effect of an oral contraceptive with chlormadinone acetate on depressive mood : analysis of data from four observational studies.

Authors:  Johannes C Huber; Marie-Luise S Heskamp; Georg A K Schramm
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; K Schmitt; C A Bono; J Steele; M K Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.