Literature DB >> 31327070

Gastrectomy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma is associated with poorer disease-free and disease-specific survival.

Mikihiro Kano1, Jun Hihara2, Mayumi Kaneko3, Kenichiro Uemura4, Hiroki Ohge4, Taijiro Sueda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a relatively rare subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma and has aggressive histopathologic characteristics, including lymphatic and vascular invasion. However, the associated long-term survival outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma with and without IMPC using propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.
METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy between 2006 and 2015 were included in the analysis. PSM analysis was performed to compensate for the background heterogeneity between the groups. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) after gastrectomy, and the secondary endpoints were disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence pattern.
RESULTS: Of 882 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma, with a follow-up duration greater than 36 months, 35 were diagnosed as having gastric adenocarcinoma with IMPC. After PSM, 70 patients, including 35 with IMPC and 35 without IMPC, were selected. Gastric adenocarcinoma with IMPC is characterized by lymphatic invasion (94% versus 69%, p = 0.012). Patients with IMPC had significantly poorer DFS than those without IMPC, with 3-year DFS rates of 62.2% and 93.4% (p = 0.003), respectively. Furthermore, a significant difference was also observed in DSS (p = 0.016); patients with IMPC more frequently developed liver metastasis (20%) than those without IMPC (3%, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: Resected gastric carcinoma with IMPC was associated with poorer DFS and DSS; furthermore, an increased rate of lymphatic invasion and liver metastasis was noted than in cases without IMPC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric carcinoma; Invasive micropapillary carcinoma; Liver metastasis; Prognosis; Propensity score matching

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31327070     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01514-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Micropapillary component in gastric adenocarcinoma: an aggressive variant associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Qingfu Zhang; Jian Ming; Siyang Zhang; Bo Li; Liying Yin; Xueshan Qiu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Invasive micropapillary carcinoma: a distinct type of adenocarcinomas in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Katarzyna Guzińska-Ustymowicz; Katarzyna Niewiarowska; Anna Pryczynicz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Gastric micropapillary carcinoma: A distinct subtype with a significantly worse prognosis in TNM stages I and II.

Authors:  Dae-Woon Eom; Gil Hyun Kang; Sang Hak Han; Gab Jin Cheon; Koon Hee Han; Ho-Suk Oh; Ji-Hun Kim; Hyuk-Jai Jang; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with lymph nodes and liver metastasis.

Authors:  Takuya Hattori; Kazuhiro Sentani; Yui Hattori; Naohide Oue; Wataru Yasui
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.534

6.  The presence of a micropapillary component predicts aggressive behaviour in early and advanced gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Ju-Han Lee; Jong-Han Kim; Jung-Woo Choi; Young-Sik Kim
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.306

7.  Immunohistochemical analysis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma pattern in four cases of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Ohtsuki; Naoto Kuroda; Shigeru Yunoki; Shinzo Murakami; Yuji Mizukami; Yuhei Okada; Mitsuko Iguchi; Gang-Hong Lee; Mutsuo Furihata
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Oncological outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched cohort analysis comparing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy versus conventional distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Michitaka Honda; Naoki Hiki; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Souya Nunobe; Hidehito Shibasaki; Atsushi Matsuki; Masahiro Watanabe; Takayuki Abe
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry.

Authors:  Atsushi Nashimoto; Kohei Akazawa; Yoh Isobe; Isao Miyashiro; Hitoshi Katai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yasuyuki Seto; Hiroshi Furukawa; Ichiro Oda; Hiroyuki Ono; Satoshi Tanabe; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.