Val Curtis1, Robert Dreibelbis2, Helen Buxton2, Nancy Izang3, Dara Adekunle3, Robert Aunger2. 1. Environmental Health Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Electronic address: val.curtis@lshtm.ac.uk. 2. Environmental Health Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. 3. TechnoServe, Ogbagi Road, Garki, Abuja, Nigeria.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Many behaviours relevant to public health are part of everyday routines. However, few tools exist to study such behaviours. Here we re-introduce the behaviour setting, an ecological psychological concept developed in the 1950s, as an approach to the study of routine behaviour. The setting concept bridges theoretical and applied approaches in sociology, psychology and social practice; its components include stage, infrastructure, props, roles, norms, competencies, objectives and resultant routines. METHODS: We applied settings theory to health-related water use behaviour in rural Nigeria. We captured the dimensions of water use behaviour settings in 23 households at varying distances from newly-introduced kiosks selling purified water. RESULTS: We found that routines concerning drinking, laundering, dish washing and handwashing were stable in their settings, varying little between households or by type of water source. Hygiene routines were suboptimal but drinking water was carefully segregated. The majority of water use behaviour was governed, not by an immediate desire to maximise health, but by long-established routines embedded in the social, technical and physical environment. Water kiosks are making only marginal improvements to the quantity and quality of water being used in homes. CONCLUSIONS: Improving public health will require the disruption of settings, for example, through bringing water infrastructure directly to the home, through the sale of new props that facilitate hygienic routines, or in the disruption of gender roles via the promotion of new norms. Settings are an ecologically valid, meso-level theoretical approach that link social and techno-physical environmental factors to behaviour. They provide a comprehensive framework within which to judge avenues for changing routine behaviours. The behaviour settings tool we developed was easy to use, provided a systematic means of capturing the determinants of routine behaviour, and the findings offered insight into methods for disrupting such behaviour.
RATIONALE: Many behaviours relevant to public health are part of everyday routines. However, few tools exist to study such behaviours. Here we re-introduce the behaviour setting, an ecological psychological concept developed in the 1950s, as an approach to the study of routine behaviour. The setting concept bridges theoretical and applied approaches in sociology, psychology and social practice; its components include stage, infrastructure, props, roles, norms, competencies, objectives and resultant routines. METHODS: We applied settings theory to health-related water use behaviour in rural Nigeria. We captured the dimensions of water use behaviour settings in 23 households at varying distances from newly-introduced kiosks selling purified water. RESULTS: We found that routines concerning drinking, laundering, dish washing and handwashing were stable in their settings, varying little between households or by type of water source. Hygiene routines were suboptimal but drinking water was carefully segregated. The majority of water use behaviour was governed, not by an immediate desire to maximise health, but by long-established routines embedded in the social, technical and physical environment. Water kiosks are making only marginal improvements to the quantity and quality of water being used in homes. CONCLUSIONS: Improving public health will require the disruption of settings, for example, through bringing water infrastructure directly to the home, through the sale of new props that facilitate hygienic routines, or in the disruption of gender roles via the promotion of new norms. Settings are an ecologically valid, meso-level theoretical approach that link social and techno-physical environmental factors to behaviour. They provide a comprehensive framework within which to judge avenues for changing routine behaviours. The behaviour settings tool we developed was easy to use, provided a systematic means of capturing the determinants of routine behaviour, and the findings offered insight into methods for disrupting such behaviour.
Authors: Sian White; Thomas Heath; Waleed Khalid Ibrahim; Dilveen Ihsan; Karl Blanchet; Val Curtis; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yolisa Nalule; Helen Buxton; Alison Macintyre; Por Ir; Ponnary Pors; Channa Samol; Supheap Leang; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Saskia Nowicki; Salome A Bukachi; Sonia F Hoque; Jacob Katuva; Mercy M Musyoka; Mary M Sammy; Martin Mwaniki; Dalmas O Omia; Faith Wambua; Katrina J Charles Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hugo Legge; Shahana Fedele; Florian Preusser; Patrycja Stys; Papy Muzuri; Moritz Schuberth; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Adam Biran; Rosie Sanderson; Diana Gonzalez; Hugo Bugoro; Mohammad Kadir; David Gegeo; Jamesford Keboy; Clement Lifoia; Sheilla Funubo; Hellenda Honimae; Lanique Naolina Pitasua; Joanna Tatalu; Patishadel Jonah; Regina Souter Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-09 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jennifer F Morton; Laura Myers; Katherine Gill; Linda-Gail Bekker; Gabrielle Stein; Katherine K Thomas; Menna Duyver; Ariane van der Straten; Margaret McConnell; Robert Aunger; Valerie Curtis; Jessie de Witt Huberts; Lut Van Damme; Jared M Baeten; Connie Celum Journal: Gates Open Res Date: 2020-07-03