Victor X Fu1, Pim Oomens2, Dimitri Sneiders3, Sjoerd A A van den Berg4, Richard A Feelders5, Bas P L Wijnhoven3, Johannes Jeekel2. 1. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: v.fu@erasmusmc.nl. 2. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current perioperative patient care aims to maintain homeostasis by attenuation of the stress response to surgery, as a more vigorous stress response can have detrimental effects on postoperative recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of perioperative music on the physiological stress response to surgery. METHODS: The Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception date until February 5, 2019, using a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines for randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of music before, during, and/or after surgery in adult surgical patients on the stress response to surgery. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and pooled standardized mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018097060). RESULTS: The literature search identified 1076 articles. Eighteen studies (1301 patients) were included in the systematic review, of which eight were included in the meta-analysis. Perioperative music attenuated the neuroendocrine cortisol stress response to surgery (pooled standardized mean difference -0.30, [95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.07], P = 0.01, I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative music can attenuate the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery.
BACKGROUND: Current perioperative patient care aims to maintain homeostasis by attenuation of the stress response to surgery, as a more vigorous stress response can have detrimental effects on postoperative recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of perioperative music on the physiological stress response to surgery. METHODS: The Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception date until February 5, 2019, using a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines for randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of music before, during, and/or after surgery in adult surgical patients on the stress response to surgery. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and pooled standardized mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018097060). RESULTS: The literature search identified 1076 articles. Eighteen studies (1301 patients) were included in the systematic review, of which eight were included in the meta-analysis. Perioperative music attenuated the neuroendocrine cortisol stress response to surgery (pooled standardized mean difference -0.30, [95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.07], P = 0.01, I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative music can attenuate the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery.
Authors: Victor X Fu; Karel J Sleurink; Joséphine C Janssen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Johannes Jeekel; Markus Klimek Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.713
Authors: Nora K Schaal; Johanna Brückner; Oliver T Wolf; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Tanja Fehm; Philip Hepp Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Pablo Kappen; Johannes Jeekel; Clemens M F Dirven; M Klimek; Steven A Kushner; Robert-Jan Osse; Michiel Coesmans; Marten J Poley; Arnaud J P E Vincent Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Victor X Fu; Pim Oomens; Vincent E E Kleinrensink; Karel J Sleurink; Willemijn M Borst; Pascale E Wessels; Johan F Lange; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Pim Oomens; Victor X Fu; Vincent E E Kleinrensink; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Johannes Jeekel Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.352