Literature DB >> 31326637

Application of the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) to patients conservatively treated: Outcomes from an institutional series.

Francesca Falcone1, Nicola Normanno2, Nunzia S Losito3, Giosuè Scognamiglio3, Riziero Esposito Abate2, Nicoletta Chicchinelli2, Gennaro Casella4, Giuseppe Laurelli4, Cono Scaffa4, Stefano Greggi4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) and determine the frequency of specific/prognostic molecular alterations within a cohort of endometrial cancer (EC) women conservatively treated by combined hysteroscopic resection and progestin therapy. STUDY
DESIGN: We used blocks of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumors of patients enrolled into the ECCo trial (EudraCT 2010-018581-23) between 2007 and 2016. In order to assign EC resectoscopic specimens to one of four ProMisE subgroups, testing involved sequential assessment of i) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2; ii) sequencing for POLE/POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs); iii) p53 IHC.
RESULTS: Molecular analysis methods were used in 25 patients (stage IA, G1-2 endometrioid EC), of whom 15 (60%) represented fully evaluable cases. Seven cases (46.7%) had abnormal MMR IHC, POLE/POLD1 EDMs were found in 3 cases (20%), and abnormal p53 IHC in 1 case (6.6%). Three patients (20%) had more than one molecular feature. Among 10 (40%) 'unclassifiable' patients, six failures in achieving complete molecular categorization were due to the low tumor volume. Molecular classification of the 15 fully evaluable cases yielded the following ProMisE subtypes: 7 (46.7%) MMR IHC abnormal, 1 (6.6%) POLE EDM, 0 (0%) p53 IHC abnormal, 7 (46.7%) p53 IHC wild-type.
CONCLUSIONS: Although larger series are needed to further assess the feasibility of a molecular categorization in a fertility-sparing setting, data presented are promising. In women with early stage low-volume disease, operative hysteroscopy could be advantageous to provide samples allowing complete genetic risk assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial neoplasm; Fertility preservation; Hysteroscopy; Molecular typing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31326637     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  Molecular Classification in Patients With Endometrial Cancer After Fertility-Preserving Treatment: Application of ProMisE Classifier and Combination of Prognostic Evidence.

Authors:  Xuting Ran; Tingwenyi Hu; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: current state and future strategies.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Eva Baxter; Donal J Brennan; Jessica N McAlpine; Jennifer J Muellerer; Frédéric Amant; Mignon D J M van Gent; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Melinda S Yates; Camilla Krakstad; Monika Janda
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 3.  The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jure Knez; Leyla Al Mahdawi; Iztok Takač; Monika Sobočan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Conservative Surgery in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gallo; Ursula Catena; Gabriele Saccone; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  The Advance and Correlation of KRAS Mutation With the Fertility-Preservation Treatment of Endometrial Cancer in the Background of Molecular Classification Application.

Authors:  KeXuan Yu; Yiqin Wang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification.

Authors:  Anna Franca Cavaliere; Federica Perelli; Simona Zaami; Marco D'Indinosante; Irene Turrini; Marco Giusti; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Alberto Mattei; Giovanni Scambia; Annalisa Vidiri; Fabrizio Signore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Fertility-sparing treatment for intramucous, moderately differentiated, endometrioid endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Cancer Inter-Group (GCIG) study.

Authors:  Francesca Falcone; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore; Violante Di Donato; Anna Myriam Perrone; Luigi Frigerio; Giuseppe Bifulco; Stephan Polterauer; Paolo Casadio; Gennaro Cormio; Valeria Masciullo; Mario Malzoni; Stefano Greggi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.