Literature DB >> 31326633

Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery.

Esther L Moss1, Panos Sarhanis2, Thomas Ind3, Michael Smith4, Quentin Davies5, Massimiliano Zecca6.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms (WMSs) are reported to be increasing in surgeons performing minimally invasive procedures. Therefore, we investigated the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) and electromyography (EMG) sensor recorders to record real-time information on the muscle movement/activity required to perform training exercises in simulated in normal and high body mass index (BMI) models.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Four consultant gynecologic oncology surgeons experienced in complex straight-stick (SS) laparoscopic and robotically assisted (RA) surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Three exercises (hoops onto pegs and wire chase) using SS and RA surgery on 2 abdominal models: normal BMI and high BMI.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured time to complete exercise and surgeon muscle movement/activity. The time to complete all exercises was significantly lower for RA surgery as compared with SS laparoscopy (p <.05 or better). The movement of the surgeons' core was significantly greater in high BMI SS laparoscopy compared with normal BMI SS laparoscopy for exercises 1 and 2 (p <.001). Muscle usage, as determined by EMG peak, was significantly higher in normal BMI SS laparoscopy and even higher in high BMI SS laparoscopy but was generally flat for all normal and high BMI RA surgery exercises (p <.05 or better).
CONCLUSION: Detailed real-time information can be collected through IMUs/EMG sensors. Our results indicate that RA surgery requires less surgeon movements and muscle activity to complete tasks compared with SS laparoscopy, particularly in a high BMI model. The implications of these results are that RA surgery in high BMI patients may therefore have less physical impact on the surgeon compared with SS laparoscopy and may result in lower WMS rates.
Copyright © 2019 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ergonomics; Obesity; Robotic-assisted surgery; Straight-stick laparoscopic surgery; Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31326633     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

Review 1.  Are Surgeons Working Smarter or Harder? A Systematic Review Comparing the Physical and Mental Demands of Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Seohyun Park; Feiyang Pan; Daniel Steffens; Jane Young; Jonathan Hong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Perceptions, Relationship, and Management of Morbidly Obese Patients and the Role of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Henri Azaïs; Gaby Moawad; Catherine Uzan; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Jérémie Belghiti
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Economic evaluation of different routes of surgery for the management of endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Esther L Moss; George Morgan; Antony Martin; Panos Sarhanis; Thomas Ind
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Objective assessment of surgeon kinematics during simulated laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary evaluation of the effect of high body mass index models.

Authors:  Ryan Sers; Steph Forrester; Massimiliano Zecca; Stephen Ward; Esther Moss
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.