Stephen V Faraone1, Anthony L Rostain2, C Brendan Montano3, Oren Mason4, Kevin M Antshel5, Jeffrey H Newcorn6. 1. SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. Electronic address: sfaraone@childpsychresearch.org. 2. Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Connecticut Clinical Research, Cromwell, CT. 4. Attention MD, Grand Rapids, MI. 5. SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Syracuse University, NY. 6. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review all literature on the nonmedical use (NMU) and diversion of prescription stimulants to better understand the characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of NMU and to review risk-reduction strategies. METHOD: We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS from inception to May 2018 for studies containing empirical data about NMU and diversion of prescription stimulants. Additional references identified by the authors were also assessed for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 111 studies met inclusion criteria. NMU and diversion of stimulants are highly prevalent; self-reported rates among population samples range from 2.1% to 58.7% and from 0.7% to 80.0%, respectively. A variety of terms are used to describe NMU, and most studies have examined college students. Although most NMU is oral, non-oral NMU also occurs. The majority of NMU is associated with no, or minor, medical effects; however, adverse medical outcomes, including death, occur in some individuals, particularly when administered by non-oral routes. Although academic and occupational performance enhancement are the most commonly cited motivations, there is little evidence that academic performance is improved by NMU in individuals without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CONCLUSION: NMU of stimulants is a significant public health problem, especially in college students, but variations in the terms used to describe NMU and inconsistencies in the available data limit a better understanding of this problem. Further research is needed to develop methods to detect NMU, identify individuals at greatest risk, study routes of administration, and devise educational and other interventions to help reduce occurrence of NMU. Colleges should consider including NMU in academic integrity policies.
OBJECTIVE: To review all literature on the nonmedical use (NMU) and diversion of prescription stimulants to better understand the characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of NMU and to review risk-reduction strategies. METHOD: We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS from inception to May 2018 for studies containing empirical data about NMU and diversion of prescription stimulants. Additional references identified by the authors were also assessed for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 111 studies met inclusion criteria. NMU and diversion of stimulants are highly prevalent; self-reported rates among population samples range from 2.1% to 58.7% and from 0.7% to 80.0%, respectively. A variety of terms are used to describe NMU, and most studies have examined college students. Although most NMU is oral, non-oral NMU also occurs. The majority of NMU is associated with no, or minor, medical effects; however, adverse medical outcomes, including death, occur in some individuals, particularly when administered by non-oral routes. Although academic and occupational performance enhancement are the most commonly cited motivations, there is little evidence that academic performance is improved by NMU in individuals without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CONCLUSION:NMU of stimulants is a significant public health problem, especially in college students, but variations in the terms used to describe NMU and inconsistencies in the available data limit a better understanding of this problem. Further research is needed to develop methods to detect NMU, identify individuals at greatest risk, study routes of administration, and devise educational and other interventions to help reduce occurrence of NMU. Colleges should consider including NMU in academic integrity policies.
Authors: Timothy E Wilens; MaryKate Martelon; Amy Yule; Tamar A Kaminski; Colin Burke; Ty S Schepis; Sean E McCabe Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Elizabeth A McGuier; David J Kolko; Sarah L Pedersen; Heidi L Kipp; Heather M Joseph; Rachel A Lindstrom; Daniel J Bauer; Geetha A Subramaniam; Brooke S G Molina Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2022-08-11
Authors: Patricia A Goodhines; Lea E Taylor; Michelle J Zaso; Kevin M Antshel; Aesoon Park Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 2.164