Literature DB >> 31326487

Clinical Use of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Emergency Department.

Kavitha M Chinnaiyan1, Robert D Safian2, Michael L Gallagher2, Julie George2, Simon R Dixon2, Abhay N Bilolikar2, Amr E Abbas2, Mazen Shoukfeh2, Marc Brodsky2, James Stewart2, Elvis Cami2, David Forst2, Steven Timmis2, Jason Crile2, Gilbert L Raff2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the feasibility, safety, clinical outcomes, and costs associated with computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in acute chest pain (ACP) patients in a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based triage program.
BACKGROUND: FFRCT is useful in determining lesion-specific ischemia in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, but its utility in ACP has not been studied.
METHODS: ACP patients with no known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary CTA and coronary CTA with FFRCT were studied. FFRCT ≤0.80 was considered positive for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
RESULTS: Among 555 patients, 297 underwent coronary CTA and FFRCT (196 negative, 101 positive), whereas 258 had coronary CTA only. The rejection rate for FFRCT was 1.6%. At 90 days, there was no difference in major adverse cardiac events (including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unexpected revascularization after the index visit) between the coronary CTA and FFRCT groups (4.3% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.310). Diagnostic failure, defined as discordance between the coronary CTA or FFRCT results with invasive findings, did not differ between the groups (1.9% vs. 1.68%; p = NS). No deaths or myocardial infarction occurred with negative FFRCT when revascularization was deferred. Negative FFRCT was associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive coronary angiography (56.5%) than positive FFRCT (8.0%) and coronary CTA (22.9%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall costs between the coronary CTA and FFRCT groups ($8,582 vs. $8,048; p = 0.550).
CONCLUSIONS: In ACP, FFRCT is feasible, with no difference in major adverse cardiac events and costs compared with coronary CTA alone. Deferral of revascularization is safe with negative FFRCT, which is associated with higher nonobstructive disease on invasive angiography.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FFR(CT); acute chest pain; coronary CT angiography; emergency department

Year:  2019        PMID: 31326487     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  10 in total

1.  Machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve assessment in acute chest pain: first experience.

Authors:  Matthias Eberhard; Tin Nadarevic; Andrej Cousin; Jochen von Spiczak; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Andre Euler; Fabian Morsbach; Robert Manka; Dagmar I Keller; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

2.  Synergistic prognostic value of coronary distensibility index and fractional flow reserve based cCTA for major adverse cardiac events in patients with Coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Zhu; Zhi-Ying Pang; Wei Jiang; Ting-Yu Dong
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.174

Review 3.  Role of CT and MRI in Cardiac Emergencies.

Authors:  Carlo Liguori; Stefania Tamburrini; Giovanni Ferrandino; Silvio Leboffe; Nicola Rosano; Ines Marano
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Machine Learning CT FFR: The Evolving Role of On-Site Techniques.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Sagit Ben Zekry
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 5.  Current Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Min Ji Son; Seung Min Yoo; Dongjun Lee; Hwa Yeon Lee; In Sup Song; Eun Ju Chun; Charles S White
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Fan Zhou; Qian Chen; Xiao Luo; Wei Cao; Ziwen Li; Bo Zhang; U Joseph Schoepf; Callum E Gill; Lili Guo; Hong Gao; Qingyao Li; Yibing Shi; Tingting Tang; Xiaochen Liu; Honglin Wu; Dongqing Wang; Feng Xu; Dongsheng Jin; Sheng Huang; Haige Li; Changjie Pan; Hongmei Gu; Lixiang Xie; Ximing Wang; Jing Ye; Jianwei Jiang; Hanqing Zhao; Xiangming Fang; Yi Xu; Wei Xing; Xiaohu Li; Xindao Yin; Guang Ming Lu; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography derived fractional flow reserve (CTFFR) in patients with coronary artery calcification: insights from multi-center experiments in China.

Authors:  Ying Tao; Yulong Gao; Xiangyu Wu; Yutong Cheng; Xianliang Yan; Yun Gao; Yuqi Liu; Yida Tang; Zhizhong Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

Review 8.  The role of cardiac computed tomography in predicting adverse coronary events.

Authors:  Maria Emfietzoglou; Michail C Mavrogiannis; Athanasios Samaras; Georgios P Rampidis; George Giannakoulas; Polydoros N Kampaktsis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-15

9.  Improving CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Analysis: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Jeffrey Waltz; Madison Kocher; Jacob Kahn; Rebecca Leddy; Jordan H Chamberlin; Daniel Cook; Jeremy R Burt
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-07

10.  Prevalence of pathological FFRCT values without coronary artery stenosis in an asymptomatic marathon runner cohort.

Authors:  Sebastian Gassenmaier; Ilias Tsiflikas; Simon Greulich; Jens Kuebler; Florian Hagen; Konstantin Nikolaou; Andreas M Niess; Christof Burgstahler; Patrick Krumm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.