Literature DB >> 31326437

Small food texture modifications can be used to change oral processing behaviour and to control ad libitum food intake.

Ana Carolina Mosca1, Armando Pohlenz Torres1, Evalien Slob1, Kees de Graaf1, Jean A McEwan2, Markus Stieger3.   

Abstract

Little is known whether small modifications of food texture are sufficient to influence satiation. This study used four iso-caloric yogurts differing in viscosity (low/high) and granola particle size (small/large) to investigate the influence of small texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, eating rate and ad libitum intake. Yogurt viscosity differed by a factor of 1.57x to 1.81x. Granola particle size was 6 mm and 12 mm (2-fold difference). Granola particle concentration based on weight was constant (15% w/w). Oral processing behaviour was quantified by video recording consumers eating yogurt ad libitum (n = 104). Ratings for appetite, liking and product familiarity were also quantified. A decrease in yogurt viscosity significantly decreased spoon size, number of chews per spoon and oral exposure time per spoon but did not significantly affect eating rate and ad libitum intake. A decrease in granola particle size from 12 mm to 6 mm at constant weight concentration significantly increased number of chews per spoon and decreased spoon size, eating rate and ad libitum intake without affecting liking. The differences in eating rate and ad libitum intake between yogurts containing small and large granola particles were 5 g/min (7%) and 17 g (5%), respectively. We suggest that the volume of granola particles added to the yogurt and not the size of particles per se was the driver of oral processing behaviour. We conclude that relatively small modifications in yogurt texture, especially granola particle size, are sufficient to change oral processing behaviour and ad libitum intake. These findings demonstrate that small texture modifications of foods, such as the size of granola particles added to yogurt, can be used to modulate eating rate and food intake within a meal.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Eating rate; Food intake; Food texture; Oral processing behaviour; Satiation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31326437     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  6 in total

1.  How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marlou Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms-What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Kees de Graaf; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Combination of Texture-Induced Oral Processing and Vegetable Preload Strategy Reduced Glycemic Excursion but Decreased Insulin Sensitivity.

Authors:  Yixue Wu; Zhihong Fan; Xinling Lou; Wenqi Zhao; Xuejiao Lu; Jiahui Hu; Yue Han; Anshu Liu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Textural Effects on Perceived Satiation and Ad Libitum Intake of Potato Chips in Males and Females.

Authors:  Jimmy Cahayadi; Sze Ying Leong; Indrawati Oey; Mei Peng
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-01-13

Review 5.  Oral Processing, Satiation and Obesity: Overview and Hypotheses.

Authors:  Arnold Slyper
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 6.  Interrelations Between Food Form, Texture, and Matrix Influence Energy Intake and Metabolic Responses.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Dieuwerke Bolhuis
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.