Maryam Moshaverinia1, Angela Navas2, Nozhan Jahedmanesh3, Kumar C Shah4, Alireza Moshaverinia5, Sahar Ansari6. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Student, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 3. Preceptor, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 4. Associate Professor and Director, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 5. Assistant Professor, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 6. Lecturer, Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. Electronic address: sansari@dentyistry.ucla.edu.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: While glass ionomer cements have many unique properties and advantages, they still lack favorable mechanical properties. EQUIA Forte Fil is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC) with improved mechanical strength. However, research and data on the physical properties of EQUIA Forte Fil are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of EQUIA Forte Fil with Fuji IX GP and ChemFil Rock, restorative GICs commonly used in dentistry. Moreover, fluoride-releasing properties and surface hardness of the GICs were also assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten disk-shaped specimens of each GIC (EQUIA Forte Fil, Fuji IX GP, and ChemFil Rock) were fabricated for mechanical and surface hardness tests by using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds. The specimens were tested after 24 hours and 7 days of immersion in distilled water at 37 °C. By using a mechanical testing machine, the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of each GIC were measured. Fluoride-releasing properties were also evaluated (10 specimens per group). A microhardness tester was used to measure the surface hardness. The mean data were analyzed by using 1- and 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS: EQUIA Forte Fil glass ionomer cements exhibited significantly greater (P<.05) flexural strength and surface hardness than Fuji IX GIC specimens. However, no significant difference (P>.05) was observed between the compressive and diametral tensile strength of EQUIA Forte Fil and Fuji IX GIC specimens. ChemFil Rock exhibited higher flexural strength than EQUIA Forte Fil (P>.05) but significantly lower compressive strength and microhardness (P<.05). Tested GICs matured after 1 week of immersion in distilled water, demonstrating a significant improvement in their mechanical properties. All the examined glass ionomers exhibited comparable initial fluoride-releasing properties, whereas EQUIA Forte Fil exhibited significantly higher (P<.05) amounts of fluoride release from the bulk of the material after 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA Forte Fil is a promising restorative material with superior flexural strength and surface hardness compared with its predecessor, Fuji IX GP, or other commercially available glass ionomers.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: While glass ionomer cements have many unique properties and advantages, they still lack favorable mechanical properties. EQUIA Forte Fil is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC) with improved mechanical strength. However, research and data on the physical properties of EQUIA Forte Fil are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of EQUIA Forte Fil with Fuji IX GP and ChemFil Rock, restorative GICs commonly used in dentistry. Moreover, fluoride-releasing properties and surface hardness of the GICs were also assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten disk-shaped specimens of each GIC (EQUIA Forte Fil, Fuji IX GP, and ChemFil Rock) were fabricated for mechanical and surface hardness tests by using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds. The specimens were tested after 24 hours and 7 days of immersion in distilled water at 37 °C. By using a mechanical testing machine, the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of each GIC were measured. Fluoride-releasing properties were also evaluated (10 specimens per group). A microhardness tester was used to measure the surface hardness. The mean data were analyzed by using 1- and 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS: EQUIA Forte Fil glass ionomer cements exhibited significantly greater (P<.05) flexural strength and surface hardness than Fuji IX GIC specimens. However, no significant difference (P>.05) was observed between the compressive and diametral tensile strength of EQUIA Forte Fil and Fuji IX GIC specimens. ChemFil Rock exhibited higher flexural strength than EQUIA Forte Fil (P>.05) but significantly lower compressive strength and microhardness (P<.05). Tested GICs matured after 1 week of immersion in distilled water, demonstrating a significant improvement in their mechanical properties. All the examined glass ionomers exhibited comparable initial fluoride-releasing properties, whereas EQUIA Forte Fil exhibited significantly higher (P<.05) amounts of fluoride release from the bulk of the material after 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: EQUIA Forte Fil is a promising restorative material with superior flexural strength and surface hardness compared with its predecessor, Fuji IX GP, or other commercially available glass ionomers.
Authors: Jullyana Mayara P Dezanetti; Bruna Luiza Nascimento; Juliana S R Orsi; Evelise M Souza Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.603