Literature DB >> 31325062

Predicting Outpatient Appointment Demand Using Machine Learning and Traditional Methods.

Brian Klute1, Andrew Homb2, Wei Chen3, Aaron Stelpflug1.   

Abstract

Traditional methods have long been used for clinical demand forecasting. Machine learning methods represent the next evolution in forecasting, but model choice and optimization remain challenging for achieving optimal results. To determine the best method to predict demand for outpatient appointments comparing machine learning and traditional methods, this retrospective study analyzed "appointment requests" at a major outpatient department in a destination medical center. Two separate locations (A and B) were assessed with 20 traditional, hybrid (traditional + machine learning) and machine learning methods to determine the best forecasting outcome (lowest Forecast Standard Error, FSE). Data characteristics from both datasets were examined. 20 forecasting models were then assessed and compared for the best result. Location A's data displayed a cyclical and non-trending pattern while Location B's displayed a cyclical and trending pattern. Both Location A and B yielded the feature engineered XGBoost model (machine learning) with the lowest out-of-sample FSE. It is important to carefully analyze and understand the underlying data set pattern and then test a variety of traditional, machine learning, and hybrid prediction methods to achieve optimal predictive results. Additionally, the use of feature engineering or hybrid methods can augment the usefulness of machine learning methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forecasting; Machine learning; Outpatient appointment; Traditional methods

Year:  2019        PMID: 31325062     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1418-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  4 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: Future opportunities.

Authors:  Natasha Davendralingam; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs; Susan C Shelmerdine
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Prioritization criteria of patients on scheduled waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  M López-Cano; V Rodrigues-Gonçalves; M Verdaguer-Tremolosa; C Petrola-Chacón; D Rosselló-Jiménez; J Saludes-Serra; M Armengol-Carrasco; J M Garcia-Alamino
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Artificial intelligence-assisted reduction in patients' waiting time for outpatient process: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Li; Dan Tian; Weihua Li; Bin Dong; Hansong Wang; Jiajun Yuan; Biru Li; Lei Shi; Xulin Lin; Liebin Zhao; Shijian Liu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Prediction of Daily Blood Sampling Room Visits Based on ARIMA and SES Model.

Authors:  Xinli Zhang; Yu Yu; Fei Xiong; Le Luo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.