Zhenmin Liu1, Arvind Subbaraj2, Karl Fraser2,3,4, Hongxin Jia1, Wenliang Chen1, Li Day2, Nicole C Roy2,3,4, Wayne Young5,6,7. 1. State Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology, Dairy Research Institute, Bright Dairy and Food Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China. 2. AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4410, New Zealand. 3. Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 4. High-Value Nutrition National Science Challenge, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 5. AgResearch Ltd., Grasslands Research Centre, Tennent Drive, Palmerston North, 4410, New Zealand. wayne.young@agresearch.co.nz. 6. Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. wayne.young@agresearch.co.nz. 7. High-Value Nutrition National Science Challenge, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. wayne.young@agresearch.co.nz.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Human breast milk is the optimal source of nutrients for growing infants. However, many circumstances can arise which preclude breast milk feeding, leading to the use of infant formula, including during the weaning period. Many diet-related effects are modulated by the gut microbiome. Therefore, we investigated the effect of human milk (HM) or infant formula (IF) on the gut microbiota in weanling rats. METHODS: The gut microbiota of weanling male Sprague-Dawley rats fed HM or IF for 28 days was analysed by shotgun metagenome sequencing. Caecal contents were analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomics. RESULTS: Numerous genera within the Proteobacteria phylum were relatively more abundant in the ileum, caecum, and colon of rats fed HM, including ileal Escherichia (HM = 9.6% ± 4.3 SEM; IF = 0.9% ± 0.3 SEM; P = 0.03). Other taxa that differed between HM- and IF-fed rats included Prevotella and Ruminococcus. Overall, more differences were observed in the ileum than the caecum and colon between rats fed HM and IF. For the rats fed IF, in the ileum, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium was higher (HM = 1.7% ± 0.7 SEM; IF = 5.0% ± 1.5 SEM; P = 0.04) with gene functions related to carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism also decreased. In the caecum, metabolic features such as bile acids were elevated while amino sugars were also decreased. CONCLUSION: Our results show that HM and IF composition differences are reflected in the gut microbiome composition and function in both the small and large intestines.
PURPOSE:Human breast milk is the optimal source of nutrients for growing infants. However, many circumstances can arise which preclude breast milk feeding, leading to the use of infant formula, including during the weaning period. Many diet-related effects are modulated by the gut microbiome. Therefore, we investigated the effect of human milk (HM) or infant formula (IF) on the gut microbiota in weanling rats. METHODS: The gut microbiota of weanling male Sprague-Dawley rats fed HM or IF for 28 days was analysed by shotgun metagenome sequencing. Caecal contents were analysed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry metabolomics. RESULTS: Numerous genera within the Proteobacteria phylum were relatively more abundant in the ileum, caecum, and colon of rats fed HM, including ileal Escherichia (HM = 9.6% ± 4.3 SEM; IF = 0.9% ± 0.3 SEM; P = 0.03). Other taxa that differed between HM- and IF-fed rats included Prevotella and Ruminococcus. Overall, more differences were observed in the ileum than the caecum and colon between rats fed HM and IF. For the rats fed IF, in the ileum, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium was higher (HM = 1.7% ± 0.7 SEM; IF = 5.0% ± 1.5 SEM; P = 0.04) with gene functions related to carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism also decreased. In the caecum, metabolic features such as bile acids were elevated while amino sugars were also decreased. CONCLUSION: Our results show that HM and IF composition differences are reflected in the gut microbiome composition and function in both the small and large intestines.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast milk; Infant formula; Metabolome; Metagenome; Rat model
Authors: Johan Bengtsson-Palme; Martin Hartmann; Karl Martin Eriksson; Chandan Pal; Kaisa Thorell; Dan Göran Joakim Larsson; Rolf Henrik Nilsson Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 7.090
Authors: Elizabeth A Maga; Prerak T Desai; Bart C Weimer; Nguyet Dao; Dietmar Kültz; James D Murray Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Zhenmin Liu; Nicole C Roy; Yanhong Guo; Hongxin Jia; Leigh Ryan; Linda Samuelsson; Ancy Thomas; Jeff Plowman; Stefan Clerens; Li Day; Wayne Young Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Chris Gale; Karen M Logan; Shalini Santhakumaran; James R C Parkinson; Matthew J Hyde; Neena Modi Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ross Overbeek; Tadhg Begley; Ralph M Butler; Jomuna V Choudhuri; Han-Yu Chuang; Matthew Cohoon; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Naryttza Diaz; Terry Disz; Robert Edwards; Michael Fonstein; Ed D Frank; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Alexander Goesmann; Andrew Hanson; Dirk Iwata-Reuyl; Roy Jensen; Neema Jamshidi; Lutz Krause; Michael Kubal; Niels Larsen; Burkhard Linke; Alice C McHardy; Folker Meyer; Heiko Neuweger; Gary Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei Osterman; Vasiliy Portnoy; Gordon D Pusch; Dmitry A Rodionov; Christian Rückert; Jason Steiner; Rick Stevens; Ines Thiele; Olga Vassieva; Yuzhen Ye; Olga Zagnitko; Veronika Vonstein Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Harro M Timmerman; Nicole B M M Rutten; Jos Boekhorst; Delphine M Saulnier; Guus A M Kortman; Nikhat Contractor; Martin Kullen; Esther Floris; Hermie J M Harmsen; Arine M Vlieger; Michiel Kleerebezem; Ger T Rijkers Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 4.379