| Literature DB >> 31324174 |
Kailiu Wu1,2, Junshui Wei3, Zhengwu Liu4, Binbin Yu1, Xi Yang1, Chunye Zhang5, Ahmed Abdelrehem6, Chenping Zhang1, Siyi Li7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is a special type of oral cancer. Cervical lymph node relapse may occur in a large percentage of TSCC patients, which usually indicates poor prognosis. In this cohort study, we focused on the predictive value of the pathological features on cervical lymph node relapse and TSCC prognosis (disease free survival).Entities:
Keywords: Cohort studies; Elective neck dissection; Head and neck cancer; Invasive front; Prognosis; Survival analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31324174 PMCID: PMC6642545 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5859-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Different pathological features of TSCC, crumb (islet-infiltrating cells with wide fronts of invasion) and trabes (thin infiltrating cords). a represents that the growth pattern of the invasion front invades the surrounding tissue like a rope, indicating a poor prognosis. b represents that the growth pattern of the invasion front advances like a clump forward, indicating a better prognosis relative to a
Baseline characteristics of the included tongue squamous cell carcinoma patients
| Items | Cases ( | Metastases (+) | Metastases (−) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 75 | 24 | 51 | 0.061 |
| Female | 66 | 12 | 54 | |
| Age (years old) | ||||
| < 55 | 59 | 14 | 45 | 0.678 |
| ≥ 55 | 82 | 22 | 60 | |
| Growth mode of invasive front | ||||
| Crumb | 79 | 8 | 71 | < 0.001 |
| Trabes | 62 | 28 | 34 | |
| Depth of invasion | ||||
| < 4 mm | 43 | 1 | 42 | < 0.001 |
| ≥ 4 mm | 98 | 35 | 63 | |
| Pathological differentiation | ||||
| Well | 48 | 7 | 41 | 0.032 |
| Moderate/poor | 93 | 29 | 64 | |
| Neurovascular invasion | ||||
| Yes | 18 | 11 | 7 | < 0.001 |
| No | 123 | 25 | 98 | |
| Location | ||||
| Anterior | 14 | 1 | 13 | 0.053 |
| Middle | 103 | 25 | 78 | |
| Back | 24 | 10 | 14 | |
| T stage | ||||
| T1 | 60 | 8 | 52 | 0.004 |
| T2 | 81 | 28 | 53 | |
| Smoking | ||||
| Yes | 59 | 21 | 38 | 0.02 |
| No | 82 | 15 | 67 | |
| Drinking | ||||
| Yes | 52 | 21 | 31 | 0.002 |
| No | 89 | 15 | 74 | |
| Treatment | ||||
| Neck dissection | 69 | 21 | 48 | 0.191 |
| Observation | 72 | 15 | 57 | |
P*: chi-square test
Univariate and multivariate analyses about parameters relevant to lymph node relapse
| Items | All patients (n) | With lymph node relapse | Without lymph node relapse | Univariate analysis | Multi-variate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 75 | 24 | 51 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Female | 66 | 12 | 54 | 0.47 (0.21–1.04) | 0.063 | 0.64 (0.15–2.69) | 0.541 |
| Age (years old) | |||||||
| < 55 | 59 | 14 | 45 | Reference | Reference | ||
| ≥ 55 | 82 | 22 | 60 | 1.18 (0.54–2.56) | 0.677 | 1.23 (0.45–3.34) | 0.683 |
| Growth mode of invasive front | |||||||
| Crumb | 79 | 8 | 71 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Trabes | 62 | 28 | 34 | 7.31 (3.01–17.72) |
| 5.03 (1.52–16.68) |
|
| Depth of invasion | |||||||
| < 4 mm | 43 | 1 | 42 | Reference | Reference | ||
| ≥ 4 mm | 98 | 35 | 63 | 23.33 (3.08–176.91) |
| 12.23 (1.31–113.90) |
|
| Pathological differentiation | |||||||
| Well | 48 | 7 | 41 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Moderate/poor | 93 | 29 | 64 | 2.65 (1.06–6.62) |
| 0.76 (0.22–2.62) | 0.667 |
| Neurovascular invasion | |||||||
| No | 123 | 25 | 98 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 18 | 11 | 7 | 6.16 (2.17–17.51) |
| 2.20 (0.61–7.97) | 0.232 |
| Location | |||||||
| Anterior | 14 | 1 | 13 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Middle | 103 | 25 | 78 | 4.17 (0.52–33.46) | 0.179 | 5.05 (0.52–49.44) | 0.164 |
| Back | 24 | 10 | 14 | 9.29 (1.04–82.96) |
| 5.74 (0.50–66.52) | 0.162 |
| T stage | |||||||
| T1 | 60 | 8 | 52 | Reference | Reference | ||
| T2 | 81 | 28 | 53 | 3.43 (1.43–8.23) |
| 1.42 (0.46–4.35) | 0.543 |
| Smoking | |||||||
| No | 82 | 15 | 67 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 59 | 21 | 38 | 2.47 (1.14–5.35) |
| 0.05 (0.00–2.00) | 0.11 |
| Drinking | |||||||
| No | 89 | 15 | 74 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 52 | 21 | 31 | 3.34 (1.53–7.32) |
| 33.62 (0.97–1169.50) | 0.052 |
| Treatment | |||||||
| Observation | 72 | 15 | 57 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Neck dissection | 69 | 21 | 48 | 1.66 (0.77–3.58) | 0.193 | 1.15 (0.41–3.26) | 0.794 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval; P*: uni-variate regression analysis; P#: multi-variate regression analysis. Note: entries in boldface means: P < 0.05
Fig. 2Survival curve for SCC patients with different clinical characteristic
Univariate and multivariate analyses on factors associated with TSCC prognosis
| Items | N | Univariate analysis | Multi-variate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | ||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 75 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Female | 66 | 0.54 | 0.25–1.16 | 0.116 | 0.33 | 0.06–1.79 | 0.201 |
| Age (years old) | |||||||
| < 55 | 59 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| ≥ 55 | 82 | 1.74 | 0.79–3.82 | 0.168 | 3.9 | 1.29–11.82 |
|
| Growth mode of invasive front | |||||||
| Crumb | 79 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Trabes | 62 | 19.16 | 4.56–80.56 |
| 6.3 | 1.15–34.43 |
|
| Depth of invasion | |||||||
| < 4 mm | 43 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| ≥ 4 mm | 98 | 39.04 | 1.56–975.46 |
| 237,144.33 | 0.00–8.820E+ 118 | 0.926 |
| Pathological differentiation | |||||||
| Well | 48 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Moderate/poor | 93 | 2.69 | 0.94–7.75 | 0.066 | 0.913 | 0.20–4.09 | 0.905 |
| Neurovascular invasion | |||||||
| No | 123 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 18 | 4.04 | 1.88–8.69 |
| 0.48 | 0.19–1.24 | 0.129 |
| Location | |||||||
| Anterior | 14 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Middle | 103 | 1.32 | 0.31–5.73 | 0.709 | 2.51 | 0.45–14.03 | 0.296 |
| Back | 24 | 3.87 | 0.85–17.68 | 0.081 | 4.66 | 0.62–35.02 | 0.135 |
| T stage | |||||||
| T1 | 60 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| T2 | 81 | 3.22 | 1.31–7.91 |
| 1.23 | 0.35–4.32 | 0.752 |
| Smoking | |||||||
| No | 82 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 59 | 2.16 | 1.03–4.52 |
| 0.00 | 0.00–2.917E+ 078 | 0.929 |
| Drinking | |||||||
| No | 89 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 52 | 2.82 | 1.34–5.91 |
| 2162.96 | 0.00–3.651E+ 085 | 0.937 |
| Treatment | |||||||
| Observation | 72 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Neck dissection | 69 | 1.24 | 0.60–2.58 | 0.565 | 0.96 | 0.40–2.30 | 0.922 |
| Lymphonodi cervicale | |||||||
| No | 105 | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Yes | 36 | 72.29 | 17.02–307.07 | < 0.001 | 36.7 | 7.68–175.35 | < 0.001 |
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval; P*: uni-variate regression analysis; P#: multi-variate regression analysis. Note: entries in boldface means: P < 0.05
Chi-square test analyses on pattern and DOI
| Pattern | DOI | Lymph Node | Chi-square test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 4 mm | > = 4 mm | OR (95%CI) | |||
| Crumb | 34 | 37 | Relapse(−) | 2.986 (1.191–7.487) | 0.017 |
| Trabes | 8 | 26 | |||
| Crumb | 2 | 14 | Relapse(+) | 11.4 (1.105–117.7) | 0.013 |
| Trabes | 0 | 56 | |||
| Crumb | 36 | 51 | Total | 7.235 (3.117–16.794) | < 0.001 |
| Trabes | 8 | 82 | |||