| Literature DB >> 31323906 |
Judith Vergara-Figueroa1,2, Serguei Alejandro-Martín3,4, Héctor Pesenti5, Fabiola Cerda6, Arturo Fernández-Pérez7, William Gacitúa8,3.
Abstract
This article describes the production of nanoparticles of Chilean natural zeolite, using three size reduction methods: Ball mill, microgrinding, and microfluidization. Morphological characterization of samples indicated an average diameter of 37.2 ± 15.8 nm of the zeolite particles. The size reduction and chemical treatments did not affect the morphology or integrity of the zeolite. An increase of the zeolite samples' Si/Al ratio was observed after the acid treatment and was confirmed by SEM-EDX analysis. Moreover, the effectiveness of the copper salt ion exchange (Cu2+) to the zeolite nanoparticles was analyzed by SEM-EDX. XRD analysis indicated that clinoptilolite and mordenite are the main phases of Chilean natural zeolite, and the crystalline structure was not affected by the modification processes. The FTIR characterization showed the presence of chemical bonds of copper with the zeolite nanoparticle framework. The ion-exchanged zeolite nanoparticles were evaluated for antibacterial behavior by the disc diffusion method. Additionally, the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration were obtained. Microbiological assays with copper-exchanged nanozeolites showed an antimicrobial activity with a bactericidal effect against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which are the primary pathogens of food and are also resistant to multiple drugs. In this study, a new application for natural nanozeolites is demonstrated, as the incorporated copper ions (Cu2+) in nanozeolites registered a productive antibacterial activity.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial properties; chilean natural nanozeolite; copper salts; ion exchange
Year: 2019 PMID: 31323906 PMCID: PMC6651861 DOI: 10.3390/ma12132202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1SEM and AFM images of natural zeolite particles after different size reduction processes. (a) SEM. Zeolite microparticles after the ball mill process; (b) SEM. Zeolite microparticles after the grinding process in a SUPER MASSCOLLOIDER; (c) AFM. nZ after the microfluidization process; (d) nZ histogram. (e) AFM. nZH-Cu; (f) nZH-Cu histogram.
Surface area and pore size distribution of Z, nZH, and nZH-Cu.
| Sample | SBET (m2/g) | BJH Adsorp Average Pore Diameter (nm) | BJH Desorp Average Pore Diameter (nm) | Volume of Micropores (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nZ | 40.2 | 14.60 | 15.73 | 0.0050 |
| nZH | 181.5 | 9.00 | 11.62 | 0.0506 |
| nZH-Cu | 41.5 | 11.15 | 11.39 | 0.0050 |
Figure 2SEM-EDX. EDX analysis of the nZ sample without treatment.
Figure 3SEM-EDX. EDX analysis to nZ after acid treatment (nZH sample).
Figure 4SEM-EDX. EDX analysis to nZ after the ion exchange process (nZH-Cu sample).
Figure 5XRD to samples of natural zeolite. (a) Z without grinding; (b) Z first grinding; (c) Z second grinding; (d) nZ; (e) nZH; (f) nZH-Cu.
Figure 6FTIR spectra of samples of natural zeolite. (a) nZH; (b) nZH-Cu.
Figure 7Disc diffusion assay against E. coli and S. aureus. (a) Using 1 and 3 mg/mL of nZH-Cu as an antimicrobial agent. (b) Using 1 and 3 mg/mL of nZH, n = 3.
Figure 8Seeding from the halos of inhibition for the strains of E. coli and S. aureus against nZH-Cu.
nZH-Cu antibacterial activity against reference strains of E. coli and S. aureus, through disc diffusion assays.
| Microbial Strain | nZH-Cu (mg/mL) | Halo (mm) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 20.2 ± 0.8 * | Intermediate |
|
| 23.2 ± 1.2 * | Susceptible | |
|
|
| 23.0 ± 1.1 ** | Susceptible |
|
| 24.7 ± 3.6 ** | Susceptible |
N = 3; *, ** mean values without significant differences.
t-test for the means of two paired samples.
| Microbial Strain |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nZH-Cu (mg/mL) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Mean | 20.2 | 23.2 | 23 | 24.7 |
| Variance | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 14.1 |
| Observations | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Pearson’s correlation coefficient | –1 | 0.04 | ||
| Hypothetical difference of the means | 0 | 0 | ||
| Degrees of freedom | 2 | 2 | ||
| Statistic t | −3 | −0.76 | ||
| P (T <= t) a tail | 0.05 | 0.26 | ||
| Critical value of t (one tail) | 2.92 | 2.92 | ||
| P (T <= t) two tails | 0.10 | 0.53 | ||
| Critical value of t (two tails) | 4.30 | 4.30 | ||
Figure 9Determination of the MIC by double serial dilution against E. coli and S. aureus. (a) Using 3 and for 1 mg/mL of nZH-Cu. (b) Using 3 and 1 mg/mL of nZH.
MIC and MBC of nZH-Cu and colony count through the serial double dilution turbidity determination assay and microdrop technique.
| Microbial Strain | Serial Double Dilution of Inoculated Broth and nZH-Cu (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | Count (Log10 CFU/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| No turbidity | Without bacterial growth | Without bacterial growth |
|
| No turbidity | Not rehearsed | Without bacterial growth | |
|
| Turbidity | Bacterial growth | 6.57 ± 0.05 | |
|
| Turbidity | Not rehearsed | Not rehearsed | |
|
| No turbidity a | Without bacterial growth b | Without bacterial growth | |
|
|
| No turbidity | Without bacterial growth | Without bacterial growth |
|
| No turbidity | Not rehearsed | Without bacterial growth | |
|
| No turbidity a | Without bacterial growth b | Without bacterial growth | |
|
| Turbidity | Not rehearsed | Not rehearsed | |
|
| No turbidity | Without bacterial growth | Without bacterial growth |
* Without dilution; MIC; MBC.
Figure 10Sowing from the tubes with strains of E. coli and S. aureus at concentrations of 3, 0.75, and 1 mg/mL of nZH-Cu.
Figure 11Bacterial count by the microdrop technique and determination of the antibacterial activity of nZH-Cu against reference strains of E. coli and S. aureus.