Literature DB >> 3132383

Evaluation of roxithromycin (RU-965) versus cephradine in pneumococcal pneumonia.

B J Zeluff1, P Lowe, H J Koornhof, L O Gentry.   

Abstract

One hundred and sixty black South African gold miners with acute pneumococcal pneumonia were enrolled in a prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing roxithromycin (150 mg 2 X day) with cephradine (1.0 g 2 X day). Ninety patients with pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae were treated for 5-10 days. Forty-three of 46 (93.4%) of the roxithromycin and all 44 (100%) of the cephradine treated groups had satisfactory clinical responses. In eight of the 46 (17%) roxithromycin treated patients and 10 of the 44 (23%) cephradine treated patients, Streptococcus pneumoniae was not eradicated from sputum cultures by the tenth day. Side effects in 18 patients (20%) were mild and were usually manifested by elevation of the transaminases; these were more common in the cephradine group (12) than in the roxithromycin group (5). Roxithromycin appears to be a safe and effective oral antibiotic for treatment of patients with mild to moderate pneumococcal pneumonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3132383     DOI: 10.1007/bf01962179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of cepharadine and cephalexin in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.

Authors:  W J Mogabgab
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1976-04

2.  IN VIVO AND IN VITRO RESISTANCE TO SULFADIAZINE IN STRAINS OF NEISSERIA MENINGITIDIS.

Authors:  J W MILLAR; E E SIESS; H A FELDMAN; C SILVERMAN; P FRANK
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cost effectiveness of vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia: an update.

Authors:  J E Sisk; R K Riegelman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Pneumococcal infection.

Authors:  R Austrian
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Antibiotic prophylaxis of carriers of sulfadiazine-resistant meningococci.

Authors:  J M Dowd; D Blink; C H Miller; P F Frank; W E Pierce
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  In vitro comparison of the activity of RU 28965, a new macrolide, with that of erythromycin against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  T Barlam; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  [RU 28965, a new semi-synthetic macrolide. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile after oral administration].

Authors:  D Tremblay; A Bryskier; M Vuckovic; A Stockis; C Manuel
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1985-06

Review 8.  Erythromycin.

Authors:  M J Gribble; A W Chow
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.456

9.  In vitro evaluation of three new macrolide antimicrobial agents, RU28965, RU29065, and RU29702, and comparisons with other orally administered drugs.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; C Thornsberry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of cefadroxil and cephalexin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  M J Blaser; B D Klaus; J A Jacobson; E Kasworm; F M LaForce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Noa Eliakim-Raz; Eyal Robenshtok; Daphna Shefet; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Liat Vidal; Mical Paul; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.