Literature DB >> 31323141

Texture-modified 3D printed dark chocolate: Sensory evaluation and consumer perception study.

Sylvester Mantihal1, Sangeeta Prakash1, Bhesh Bhandari1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the preferences and perceptions of texture-modified three-dimensional (3D) printed chocolate through three measures: two tasting tests and one survey. In the first test, 30 semitrained panelists ranked their overall preference from among the three samples of chocolate printed in a honeycomb pattern with infill percentages (IPs) of 25, 50, and 100%. The panelists ranked the samples based on appearance and hardness. In the second test, the same panelists nominated one preference between a 3D printed sample (100% IP) and a cast commercial chocolate sample. Friedman test indicated that there was no significant difference in overall preferences for hardness although the panelists significantly preferred the appearance of samples with 25 and 50% over the 100% infill. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in preference between the cast and 100% infill samples. The texture data of the chocolate samples showed that a higher force was required to break the chocolate samples as the IP increased from 25% (20.4 ± 1.1 N) to 100% (54.4 ± 1.5 N). Also, the 3D printed chocolate (printed in 100% IP) was found to be less hard than that of casted chocolate. In the survey of consumer perceptions, a total of 244 participated and assessed the samples for their intricate design and novel technology concept through a questionnaire. While there was a general awareness of 3D printing technology among these participants, many were impressed with the application of 3D printing to chocolate, as this was the first time they had seen this. The results obtained from the sensory tests and consumer survey provided a useful insight into consumers' perception of 3D food printing and the 3D products design. This awareness will be beneficial to promote this technology in the food industry.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D food printing; infill percentage; sensory; texture modification

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31323141     DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Texture Stud        ISSN: 0022-4901            Impact factor:   3.223


  6 in total

Review 1.  Towards the Development of 3D-Printed Food: A Rheological and Mechanical Approach.

Authors:  Viridiana Tejada-Ortigoza; Enrique Cuan-Urquizo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Application of 3D Printing in the Design of Functional Gluten-Free Dough.

Authors:  Adrián Matas; Marta Igual; Purificación García-Segovia; Javier Martínez-Monzó
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 3.  How to Formulate for Structure and Texture via Medium of Additive Manufacturing-A Review.

Authors:  Azarmidokht Gholamipour-Shirazi; Michael-Alex Kamlow; Ian T Norton; Tom Mills
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 4.  Food Texture Design by 3D Printing: A Review.

Authors:  Tatiana Pereira; Sónia Barroso; Maria M Gil
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-02-03

Review 5.  Consumer acceptance of new food trends resulting from the fourth industrial revolution technologies: A narrative review of literature and future perspectives.

Authors:  Abdo Hassoun; Janna Cropotova; Monica Trif; Alexandru Vasile Rusu; Otilia Bobiş; Gulzar Ahmad Nayik; Yash D Jagdale; Farhan Saeed; Muhammad Afzaal; Parisa Mostashari; Amin Mousavi Khaneghah; Joe M Regenstein
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  Effect of Labelling and Information on Consumer Perception of Foods Presented as 3D Printed.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Feng; Khemiga Khemacheevakul; Susana De León Siller; John Wolodko; Wendy Wismer
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.