Jos Rozema1,2, Sebastian Dankert3, Rafael Iribarren4, Carla Lanca5, Seang-Mei Saw5,6,7. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Immunopathology and Ophthalmology Translational Research Lab, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore. 6. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore. 7. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Abstract
Purpose: We studied biometry changes before and after myopia onset in a cohort of Singaporean children. Methods: All data were taken from the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM). Participants underwent refraction and biometry measurements with a follow-up of 3 to 6 years. The longitudinal ocular biometry (spherical equivalent refraction, axial length, and lens power) changes were compared between children who suffered myopia during the study (N = 303), emmetropic children (N = 490), and children myopic at baseline (N = 509). Results: At myopia onset, the myopic shift increased to 0.50 diopters (D)/y or more in new myopes compared to the minor changes in emmetropes of the same age. New myopes had higher axial growth rates than emmetropes, even years before myopia onset (0.37 and 0.14 mm/y, respectively; ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, P < 0.001). After onset, the change in both parameters slowed down gradually, but significantly (P < 0.05). In new myopes, lens power loss (-0.71 D/y) was significantly higher up to 1 year before myopia onset compared to emmetropes (-0.46 D/y), after which lens power loss slows down rapidly. At age 7 years, (future) new myopes had lens power values close to those of emmetropes (25.12 and 25.23 D, respectively), while later these values approached those of children who were myopic at baseline (23.06 and 22.79 D, respectively, compared to 23.71 D for emmetropes; P < 0.001). Conclusions: New myopes have higher axial growth rates and lens power loss before myopia onset than persistent emmetropes.
Purpose: We studied biometry changes before and after myopia onset in a cohort of Singaporean children. Methods: All data were taken from the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM). Participants underwent refraction and biometry measurements with a follow-up of 3 to 6 years. The longitudinal ocular biometry (spherical equivalent refraction, axial length, and lens power) changes were compared between children who suffered myopia during the study (N = 303), emmetropic children (N = 490), and children myopic at baseline (N = 509). Results: At myopia onset, the myopic shift increased to 0.50 diopters (D)/y or more in new myopes compared to the minor changes in emmetropes of the same age. New myopes had higher axial growth rates than emmetropes, even years before myopia onset (0.37 and 0.14 mm/y, respectively; ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, P < 0.001). After onset, the change in both parameters slowed down gradually, but significantly (P < 0.05). In new myopes, lens power loss (-0.71 D/y) was significantly higher up to 1 year before myopia onset compared to emmetropes (-0.46 D/y), after which lens power loss slows down rapidly. At age 7 years, (future) new myopes had lens power values close to those of emmetropes (25.12 and 25.23 D, respectively), while later these values approached those of children who were myopic at baseline (23.06 and 22.79 D, respectively, compared to 23.71 D for emmetropes; P < 0.001). Conclusions: New myopes have higher axial growth rates and lens power loss before myopia onset than persistent emmetropes.
Authors: Paul Chamberlain; Percy Lazon de la Jara; Baskar Arumugam; Mark A Bullimore Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Sara McCullough; Gary Adamson; Karen M M Breslin; Julie F McClelland; Lesley Doyle; Kathryn J Saunders Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.379