Literature DB >> 31322308

The pH sensitivity of APT-CEST using phosphorus spectroscopy as a reference method.

Jan-Rüdiger Schüre1, Manoj Shrestha2, Stella Breuer1, Ralf Deichmann2, Elke Hattingen1, Marlies Wagner1, Ulrich Pilatus1.   

Abstract

The pH value is a potential physiological marker for clinical diagnosis as it is altered in pathologies such as tumors. While intracellular pH can be measured noninvasively via phosphorus spectroscopy (31 P MRSI), Amide Proton Transfer-Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (APT-CEST) MRI has been suggested as an alternative method for pH quantification. To assess the suitability of APT-CEST contrast for pH quantification, two approaches (magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry [MTRasym ] and Lorentzian difference analysis [LDA]) for analyzing the Z-spectrum have been correlated with pH values obtained by 31 P MRSI. Fourteen patients with glioblastoma and 12 healthy controls were included. In contrast to MTRasym , the LDA is modeling the direct water saturation and the semi-solid magnetization transfer, allowing a separate evaluation of the aliphatic nuclear Overhauser effect and the APT-CEST. The results of our study show that the pH values obtained by 31 P MRSI correspond well with both methods describing the APT-CEST contrast. Two-sample t-test showed significant differences in MTRasym , LDA and pH obtained by 31 P MRSI for regions of interest in glioblastoma, contralateral control areas and normal appearing white matter (P < 0.001). A slightly improved correlation between the amide signal and pH was found after performing LDA (r = 0.78) compared with MTRasym (r = 0.70). While both methods can be used to monitor pH changes, the LDA approach appears to be better suited.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular and molecular cancer imaging; cellular and molecular imaging; chemical exchange saturation transfer; endogenous contrast methods; head and neck cancer; magnetization transfer; phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31322308     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  8 in total

1.  Investigating the origin of pH-sensitive magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry MRI contrast during the acute stroke: Correction of T1 change reveals the dominant amide proton transfer MRI signal.

Authors:  Limin Wu; Liang Jiang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Saturation transfer properties of tumour xenografts derived from prostate cancer cell lines 22Rv1 and DU145.

Authors:  Ziyu Tan; Wilfred W Lam; Wendy Oakden; Leedan Murray; Margaret M Koletar; Stanley K Liu; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Assessment of Amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) MRI for pre-surgical prediction of final diagnosis in gliomas.

Authors:  Faris Durmo; Anna Rydhög; Frederik Testud; Jimmy Lätt; Benjamin Schmitt; Anna Rydelius; Elisabet Englund; Johan Bengzon; Peter van Zijl; Linda Knutsson; Pia C Sundgren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Glioma stem cells and their roles within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Boyd; Anh Nhat Tran; Joshua D Bernstock; Tina Etminan; Amber B Jones; G Yancey Gillespie; Gregory K Friedman; Anita B Hjelmeland
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 5.  Repurposing Clinical Agents for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Zelong Chen; Zheng Han; Guanshu Liu
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Jianpan Huang; Zilin Chen; Se-Weon Park; Joseph H C Lai; Kannie W Y Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Lorentzian-Corrected Apparent Exchange-Dependent Relaxation (LAREX) Ω-Plot Analysis-An Adaptation for qCEST in a Multi-Pool System: Comprehensive In Silico, In Situ, and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Karl Ludger Radke; Lena Marie Wilms; Miriam Frenken; Julia Stabinska; Marek Knet; Benedikt Kamp; Thomas Andreas Thiel; Timm Joachim Filler; Sven Nebelung; Gerald Antoch; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Anja Müller-Lutz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Moritz Zaiss; Linda Knutsson; Phillip Zhe Sun; Sung Soo Ahn; Silvio Aime; Peter Bachert; Jaishri O Blakeley; Kejia Cai; Michael A Chappell; Min Chen; Daniel F Gochberg; Steffen Goerke; Hye-Young Heo; Shanshan Jiang; Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim; John Laterra; Daniel Paech; Mark D Pagel; Ji Eun Park; Ravinder Reddy; Akihiko Sakata; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; A Dean Sherry; Seth A Smith; Greg J Stanisz; Pia C Sundgren; Osamu Togao; Moriel Vandsburger; Zhibo Wen; Yin Wu; Yi Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Zhongliang Zu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.737

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.