Literature DB >> 31321517

Development and validation of the Heidelberg Neurological Triage System (HEINTS).

Hanna M Oßwald1, Linda Harenberg1, Hannah Jaschonek1, Sibu Mundiyanapurath1, Jan C Purrucker1, Geraldine Rauch2,3, Peter A Ringleb1, Simon Nagel4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Neurological syndromes are underrepresented in existing triage systems which are not validated for neurological patients; therefore, we developed and validated the new Heidelberg Neurological Triage System (HEINTS) in a prospective, single-center observational study.
METHODS: Patients were triaged according to the new triage system by nurses and physicians (stage 1) as well as trained nurses (stage 2). In stage 1, all patients presenting to the neurological emergency room (ER) were triaged by nurses and physicians. In stage 2, three specially trained nurses triaged patients according to HEINTS. The main outcomes comprised interrater agreement between nurses' and physicians' triage (stage 1), sensitivity and specificity to detect emergencies (stages 1 and 2), and improvement in triage quality as a result of training (stage 2), as well as correlation of HEINTS with hospital admissions and resource utilization.
RESULTS: In stage 1 (n = 2423 patients), sensitivity and specificity to detect neurological emergencies were 84.2% (SD 0.8%) and 85.4% (SD 0.8%) for nurses, as well as 92.4% (SD 0.6%) and 84.1% (SD 0.9%) for physicians, respectively. The interrater-reliability between nurses and physicians in stage 1 was moderate [Cohen's kappa 0.44, standard deviation (SD) 0.02]. In stage 2 (n = 506 patients), sensitivity of trained nurses increased to 94.3% (SD 1.0%), while specificity decreased to 74.8% (SD 1.9%). Correlation of HEINTS triage with hospital admission and resource utilization in both stages was highly significant.
CONCLUSIONS: HEINTS predicted hospital admissions and resource utilization. Agreement between nurses and physicians was moderate. HEINTS, applied by physicians and by nurses after training, reliably detected neurological emergencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency room; Neurological emergency; Triage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31321517     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09472-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Transporting clinical tools to new settings: cultural adaptation and validation of the Emergency Severity Index in German.

Authors:  Florian F Grossmann; Christian H Nickel; Michael Christ; Kristian Schneider; Rebecca Spirig; Roland Bingisser
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Detrimental role of delayed antibiotic administration and penicillin-nonsusceptible strains in adult intensive care unit patients with pneumococcal meningitis: the PNEUMOREA prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Marc Auburtin; Michel Wolff; Julien Charpentier; Emmanuelle Varon; Yves Le Tulzo; Christophe Girault; Ismaël Mohammedi; Benoît Renard; Bruno Mourvillier; Fabrice Bruneel; Jean-Damien Ricard; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales.

Authors:  Michele Twomey; Lee A Wallis; Jonathan E Myers
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Disagreement among health care professionals about the urgent care needs of emergency department patients.

Authors:  J M Gill; C L Reese; J J Diamond
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  More patients are triaged using the Emergency Severity Index than any other triage acuity system in the United States.

Authors:  Megan McHugh; Paula Tanabe; Mark McClelland; Rahul K Khare
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Blood pressure management in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: relationship between elevated blood pressure and hematoma enlargement.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ohwaki; Eiji Yano; Hiroshi Nagashima; Masafumi Hirata; Tadayoshi Nakagomi; Akira Tamura
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  A definition and classification of status epilepticus--Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Eugen Trinka; Hannah Cock; Dale Hesdorffer; Andrea O Rossetti; Ingrid E Scheffer; Shlomo Shinnar; Simon Shorvon; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 8.  [Emergency Triage. An Overview].

Authors:  Michael Christ; Roland Bingisser; Christian Hans Nickel
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 0.628

9.  Predictive validity comparison of two five-level triage acuity scales.

Authors:  Andrew Worster; Christopher M Fernandes; Kevin Eva; Suneel Upadhye
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.799

10.  A time and motion study of patients presenting at the accident and emergency department at Mater Dei Hospital.

Authors:  Matthias Azzopardi; Marija Cauchi; Karl Cutajar; Robert Ellul; Charles Mallia-Azzopardi; Victor Grech
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-18
View more
  3 in total

1.  The use of a dedicated neurological triage system improves process times and resource utilization: a prospective observational study from an interdisciplinary emergency department.

Authors:  Carolin Hoyer; Patrick Stein; Hans-Werner Rausch; Angelika Alonso; Simon Nagel; Michael Platten; Kristina Szabo
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-25

2.  Patient disposition using the Emergency Severity Index: a retrospective observational study at an interdisciplinary emergency department.

Authors:  Stefanie Völk; Uwe Koedel; Sophia Horster; Andreas Bayer; Jan G D'Haese; Hans-Walter Pfister; Matthias Klein
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Posterior Circulation Stroke in the Emergency Setting.

Authors:  Carolin Hoyer; Kristina Szabo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.