Literature DB >> 31321128

Elbow Resection for Deep Infection After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique.

Joaquin Sanchez Sotelo1, Peter Zarkadas2, Thomas Throckmorton3, Bernard F Morrey1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Deep infection at the site of a total elbow arthroplasty is best managed with definitive removal of the components with resection arthroplasty in selected patients. STEP 1 SKIN INCISION AND FLAP MANAGEMENT: Use a previous skin incision when possible, keep the subcutaneous flaps as thick as possible, and avoid inadvertent iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. STEP 2 IDENTIFY ULNAR AND RADIAL NERVES: The location of the ulnar nerve may be unpredictable, and the radial nerve may be at risk in two different locations. STEP 3 DEAL WITH EXTENSOR MECHANISM: Access the implants through windows on the medial and lateral aspects of the triceps; whenever possible, consider an extended olecranon osteotomy when the ulnar component and cement are well fixed. STEP 4 REMOVE HUMERAL COMPONENT AND CEMENT: Removal of all retained cement after removal of the humeral component is critical. STEP 5 REMOVE ULNAR COMPONENT AND CEMENT: The ulna is much more delicate and fragile than the humerus and is prone to iatrogenic fracture. STEP 6 OBTAIN SAMPLES FOR CULTURES AND PATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS: Send three separate samples for culture when there was at least one preoperative positive culture, and five samples when there were no positive preoperative cultures. STEP 7 PREPARE AND INSERT SPACER: Use the nozzles of cement guns to create cylinders of cement to be inserted in the ulna and humerus. STEP 8 CLOSE: For patients with compromised soft tissues, we often consult with a plastic surgeon prior to surgery to contemplate improved coverage with rotation or free flaps at the time of the resection arthroplasty. STEP 9 POSTOPERATIVE IMMOBILIZATION AND CARE: Early motion in an articulated brace may be allowed with a "stable" resection; unstable resections with substantial bone loss are best protected longer with no motion and may require a static brace.
RESULTS: We recently reviewed the Mayo Clinic experience with resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection after total elbow replacement. WHAT TO WATCH FOR: IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 31321128      PMCID: PMC6554088          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.K.00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech        ISSN: 2160-2204


  4 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of resection arthroplasty for the failed total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter C Zarkadas; Benjamin Cass; Thomas Throckmorton; Robert Adams; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Results of reconstruction for failed total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  M P Figgie; A E Inglis; C S Mow; S W Wolfe; T P Sculco; H E Figgie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Infection after total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; R A Adams; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  [Reconstructive plastic surgery of the humeral condyles following removal of endoprostheses of the elbow versus arthrodesis].

Authors:  N Gschwend
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.