Erratum: How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/nc/niz009.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/nc/niz009.].

Neuroscience of Consciousness, Volume 2019, Issue 1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niz009

In the original version of this article, the section ‘The reason for metacognitive inflation’ contained a small error. The corrected sentence reads as follows:

Therefore, metacognitive noise likely contributed to the increase in metacognitive efficiency scores (meta-d′/d′ and meta-d′–d′) in the current analyses but not to the increase in metacognitive sensitivity scores (meta-d′, type 2 AUC, and phi) (Bang et al. 2019).

The authors would like to apologize for any confusion this may have caused.