Edith Chen1, Robin Hayen2, Van Le2, Makeda K Austin2, Madeleine U Shalowitz3, Rachel E Story4, Gregory E Miller2. 1. Department of Psychology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; and edith.chen@northwestern.edu. 2. Department of Psychology and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; and. 3. Center for Clinical Research Informatics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois. 4. Department of Medicine and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poor neighborhood conditions have established associations with poorer child health, but little is known about protective factors that mitigate the effects of difficult neighborhood conditions. In this study, we tested if positive family relationships can buffer youth who live in dangerous and/or disorderly neighborhoods from poor asthma outcomes. METHODS: A total of 308 youths (aged 9-17) who were physician-diagnosed with asthma and referred from community pediatricians and/or family practitioners participated in this cross-sectional study. Neighborhood conditions around families' home addresses were coded by using Google Street View images. Family relationship quality was determined via youth interviews. Clinical asthma outcomes (asthma symptoms, activity limitations, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentile), asthma management behaviors (family response to asthma symptoms and integration of asthma into daily life), and asthma-relevant immunologic processes (lymphocyte T helper 1 and T helper 2 cytokine production and sensitivity to glucocorticoid inhibition) were assessed via questionnaires, interviews, spirometry, and blood draws. RESULTS: Significant interactions were found between neighborhood conditions and family relationship quality (β = |.11-.15|; P < .05). When neighborhood danger and/or disorder was low, family relationships were not associated with asthma. When neighborhood danger and/or disorder was high, better family relationship quality was associated with fewer asthma symptoms, fewer activity limitations, and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentile. Similar patterns emerged for asthma management behaviors. With immunologic measures, greater neighborhood danger and/or disorder was associated with greater T helper 1 and T helper 2 cytokine production and reduced glucocorticoid sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: When youth live in dangerous and/or disorderly neighborhoods, high family relationship quality can buffer youth from poor asthma outcomes. Although families may not be able to change their neighborhoods, they may nonetheless be able to facilitate better asthma outcomes in their children through strong family relationships.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poor neighborhood conditions have established associations with poorer child health, but little is known about protective factors that mitigate the effects of difficult neighborhood conditions. In this study, we tested if positive family relationships can buffer youth who live in dangerous and/or disorderly neighborhoods from poor asthma outcomes. METHODS: A total of 308 youths (aged 9-17) who were physician-diagnosed with asthma and referred from community pediatricians and/or family practitioners participated in this cross-sectional study. Neighborhood conditions around families' home addresses were coded by using Google Street View images. Family relationship quality was determined via youth interviews. Clinical asthma outcomes (asthma symptoms, activity limitations, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentile), asthma management behaviors (family response to asthma symptoms and integration of asthma into daily life), and asthma-relevant immunologic processes (lymphocyte T helper 1 and T helper 2 cytokine production and sensitivity to glucocorticoid inhibition) were assessed via questionnaires, interviews, spirometry, and blood draws. RESULTS: Significant interactions were found between neighborhood conditions and family relationship quality (β = |.11-.15|; P < .05). When neighborhood danger and/or disorder was low, family relationships were not associated with asthma. When neighborhood danger and/or disorder was high, better family relationship quality was associated with fewer asthma symptoms, fewer activity limitations, and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentile. Similar patterns emerged for asthma management behaviors. With immunologic measures, greater neighborhood danger and/or disorder was associated with greater T helper 1 and T helper 2 cytokine production and reduced glucocorticoid sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: When youth live in dangerous and/or disorderly neighborhoods, high family relationship quality can buffer youth from poor asthma outcomes. Although families may not be able to change their neighborhoods, they may nonetheless be able to facilitate better asthma outcomes in their children through strong family relationships.
Authors: Judith E Carroll; Tara L Gruenewald; Shelley E Taylor; Denise Janicki-Deverts; Karen A Matthews; Teresa E Seeman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rosalind J Wright; Sheldon Cohen; Vincent Carey; Scott T Weiss; Diane R Gold Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Rosalind J Wright; Herman Mitchell; Cynthia M Visness; Sheldon Cohen; James Stout; Richard Evans; Diane R Gold Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Leonard B Bacharier; Robert C Strunk; David Mauger; Deborah White; Robert F Lemanske; Christine A Sorkness Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jennifer A Lucas; Miguel Marino; Sophia Giebultowicz; Katie Fankhauser; Shakira F Suglia; Steffani R Bailey; Andrew Bazemore; John Heintzman Journal: Fam Med Community Health Date: 2021-07
Authors: Kelsey L Corallo; Sarah M Lyle; Michael L M Murphy; Michelle R vanDellen; Katherine B Ehrlich Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.864