Literature DB >> 31320322

Digital aripiprazole or digital evergreening? A systematic review of the evidence and its dissemination in the scientific literature and in the media.

Lisa Cosgrove1, Ioana Alina Cristea2,3, Allen F Shaughnessy4, Barbara Mintzes5, Florian Naudet6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In November 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a version of a second-generation antipsychotic, aripiprazole, embedded with a sensor (Abilify MyCite).
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence supporting the FDA's approval of digital aripiprazole and how that evidence was disseminated in the scientific literature and news reports. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised and non-comparative studies were included if they focused on the use of digital aripiprazole. All scientific publications citing the trials were included if written in English. For the news reports, all languages were included if an English translation was available, and all records that were published after FDA approval were included.
FINDINGS: In the primary evidence search, no RCT comparing digital aripiprazole with a non-digital formulation, other active comparators or placebo was found. Only three non-comparative uncontrolled cohorts were found. No study provided data on remission, quality of life or any efficacy outcome. Fourteen scientific papers were identified that cited the trials and 70 news stories met the inclusion criteria. Almost 80% (11/14) of the scientific papers and three-fourths (52/70) of the news stories conveyed an unsupported impression of benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Regulatory approval for this first-ever digital drug was based on weak evidence, and there was no evidence of better adherence with the digital version of aripiprazole compared with the non-digital version. The possibilities afforded by this technology make room for a new type of evergreening (ie, patenting of older drugs with a sensor as a 'new invention'). Both the scientific literature and news reports conveyed an unsupported impression of benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089515. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mental health; psychiatry; public health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31320322     DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med        ISSN: 2515-446X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Psychiatry in the Digital Age: A Blessing or a Curse?

Authors:  Carl B Roth; Andreas Papassotiropoulos; Annette B Brühl; Undine E Lang; Christian G Huber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The Application of Digital Technology in the Complex Situation of News Dissemination from the Perspective of New Media Art.

Authors:  Xunxun Jiang; Tong Mao; Jing Tian
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Acceptability of and Willingness to Take Digital Pills by Patients, the Public, and Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Content Analysis of a Large Online Survey.

Authors:  Astrid Chevance; Axel Fortel; Adeline Jouannin; Faustine Denis; Marie-France Mamzer; Philippe Ravaud; Stephanie Sidorkiewicz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.076

4.  Analysis of consumer product preference and news media based on data mining technology.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Zengguang Fan; Yuhui Qi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.