Literature DB >> 31320315

A review of the FDA-approved molecular testing platforms for human papillomavirus.

Katrina L Salazar1, Daniel J Duhon2, Randall Olsen1, Michael Thrall1.   

Abstract

The advent of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved molecular testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has resulted in a dramatic shift from cytological testing alone to a combination of cytology and molecular testing for primary HPV screening. HPV testing has quickly become an essential component of daily practice in most laboratories and clinical practices. Although the principle of HPV testing is now familiar, it is important to understand the mechanisms behind these platforms in order to properly interpret the results and understand the limits of each method. HPV tests are more automated and reproducible than cytology, but are by no means perfect. None of these platforms will identify every HSIL/CIN2+ or cancer. This fact must be kept in mind when correlating the results of HPV testing with cytology or biopsy findings. The goal of this paper is to review the FDA- approved molecular testing platforms for HPV, including methodology, limitations, and specifications. The concordance between the platforms will also be discussed. Package inserts of the 5 FDA- approved molecular testing platforms for HPV, as well as a literature review of the platforms, were reviewed and assimilated into the article. Due to the multiple modalities available for detection of hrHPV, the concordance between these assays becomes important. Prior publications have compared HC2, Cervista, cobas, and Aptima, with most studies comparing to HC2 because it is considered the reference standard. With the newly approved BD platform, concordance studies were reviewed as well.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDA-approved; Human Papillomavirus; Molecular; Review; Testing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31320315     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Cytopathol        ISSN: 2213-2953


  12 in total

1.  Machine Learning Interpretation of Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping by Onclarity in an Asian Cervical Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Oscar G W Wong; Idy F Y Ng; Obe K L Tsun; Herbert H Pang; Philip P C Ip; Annie N Y Cheung
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Advances in HPV Screening Tests for Cervical Cancer-A Review.

Authors:  Pesona Grace Lucksom; Mingma Lhamu Sherpa; Anup Pradhan; Sunaina Lal; Chamma Gupta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 3.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Cervical Precancers and Cancers Attributed to HPV Types by Race and Ethnicity: Implications for Vaccination, Screening, and Management.

Authors:  Jacqueline Mix; Mona Saraiya; Benjamin D Hallowell; Brian Befano; Li C Cheung; Elizabeth R Unger; Julia W Gargano; Lauri E Markowitz; Philip E Castle; Tina Raine-Bennett; Joan Walker; Rosemary Zuna; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Julia C Gage
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 11.816

Review 5.  Current and Future Trends in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Giorgia Caruso; Anna Giammanco; Roberta Virruso; Teresa Fasciana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) by the novel AmpFire isothermal HPV assay among pregnant women in Pemba Island, Tanzania.

Authors:  Naomi Christine Angela Juliana; Mohamed Hamad Juma; Roel Heijmans; Sander Ouburg; Said Mohammed Ali; Aishwarya Singh Chauhan; Amanhi Biobank Pemba; Sunil Sazawal; Servaas Antonie Morré; Saikat Deb; Elena Ambrosino
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-10-27

7.  NanoString Technology for Human Papillomavirus Typing.

Authors:  Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Sonya Patel; Tengguo Li; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data.

Authors:  Yunfeng Fu; Xiao Li; Ying Li; Weiguo Lu; Xing Xie; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-02-16

9.  HPV E1 qPCR, a Low-Cost Alternative Assay to Roche Diagnostic Linear Array is Effective in Identifying Women at Risk for Developing Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Chandrika J Piyathilake; Suguna Badiga; Janice L Simons; Walter C Bell; Pauline E Jolly
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-19

10.  Assessing the feasibility of a rapid, high-volume cervical cancer screening programme using HPV self-sampling and digital colposcopy in rural regions of Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Andrew Goldstein; Lena Sophia Goldstein; Roberta Lipson; Sarah Bedell; Jue Wang; Sarah A Stamper; Gal Brenner; Gail R Goldstein; Karen Davis O'Keefe; S Casey O'Keefe; McKenna O'Keefe; Tierney O'Keefe; Amelia R Goldstein; Anna Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.