Katsuhiro Yoshimura1, Yusuke Inoue1, Masato Karayama2, Kazuo Tsuchiya1, Kazutaka Mori2, Yuzo Suzuki2, Yuji Iwashita3, Tomoaki Kahyo3, Akikazu Kawase4, Masayuki Tanahashi5, Hiroshi Ogawa6, Koushi Yokomura7, Naoki Inui8, Kazuhito Funai4, Kazuya Shinmura3, Hiroshi Niwa5, Takafumi Suda2, Haruhiko Sugimura9. 1. Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan; Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. 2. Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. 3. Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. 4. First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. 5. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Respiratory Disease Center, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan. 6. Department of Pathology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan. 7. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan. 8. Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. 9. Department of Tumor Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. Electronic address: hsugimur@hama-med.ac.jp.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at advanced stages where small biopsy specimens obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are sometimes the only available samples for diagnosis. We aimed to determine whether EBUS-TBNA specimens are suitable for the evaluation of PD-L1 protein expression and copy number alterations (CNAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PD-L1 protein expression and CNAs in 71 EBUS-TBNA specimens of NSCLC were assessed. Sixty-eight corresponding transbronchial biopsy (TBB) specimens from primary sites, thirteen resected primary tumors, and six resected metastases were comparatively analyzed. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry (E1L3N). Positivity of ≥1% was used as the cutoff. PD-L1 CNAs were assessed with fluorescent in situ hybridization and were classified into three categories: amplification, polysomy, and disomy. Concordance between EBUS-TBNA and other specimens was calculated. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 48 men (67.6%), 15 never-smokers (21.1%), and 39 adenocarcinomas (54.9%). The concordance of PD-L1 positivity between EBUS-TBNA and other specimens was moderate; κ = 0.63 for EBUS-TBNA vs. TBB, κ = 0.68 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected primary tumors, and κ = 1.0 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected metastases. The concordance of PD-L1 CNA status was comparable with that of PD-L1 expression: κ = 0.60 for EBUS-TBNA vs. TBB and κ = 0.74 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected primary tumors. When PD-L1 copy number was assessed as a continuous variable, the correlation of PD-L1 CNAs was superior to that of PD-L1 expression. Intratumorally, PD-L1 copy number was less heterogeneous than protein expression in whole sections of resected tumors. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA specimens can be used to assess PD-L1 CNAs and protein expression. Although spatial heterogeneity should be considered for accurate interpretation, the evaluation of PD-L1 CNAs provides more reproducible results than that of protein expression levels especially with regard to intratumoral heterogeneity.
OBJECTIVES: Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at advanced stages where small biopsy specimens obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are sometimes the only available samples for diagnosis. We aimed to determine whether EBUS-TBNA specimens are suitable for the evaluation of PD-L1 protein expression and copy number alterations (CNAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS:PD-L1 protein expression and CNAs in 71 EBUS-TBNA specimens of NSCLC were assessed. Sixty-eight corresponding transbronchial biopsy (TBB) specimens from primary sites, thirteen resected primary tumors, and six resected metastases were comparatively analyzed. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry (E1L3N). Positivity of ≥1% was used as the cutoff. PD-L1 CNAs were assessed with fluorescent in situ hybridization and were classified into three categories: amplification, polysomy, and disomy. Concordance between EBUS-TBNA and other specimens was calculated. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 48 men (67.6%), 15 never-smokers (21.1%), and 39 adenocarcinomas (54.9%). The concordance of PD-L1 positivity between EBUS-TBNA and other specimens was moderate; κ = 0.63 for EBUS-TBNA vs. TBB, κ = 0.68 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected primary tumors, and κ = 1.0 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected metastases. The concordance of PD-L1 CNA status was comparable with that of PD-L1 expression: κ = 0.60 for EBUS-TBNA vs. TBB and κ = 0.74 for EBUS-TBNA vs. resected primary tumors. When PD-L1 copy number was assessed as a continuous variable, the correlation of PD-L1 CNAs was superior to that of PD-L1 expression. Intratumorally, PD-L1 copy number was less heterogeneous than protein expression in whole sections of resected tumors. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA specimens can be used to assess PD-L1 CNAs and protein expression. Although spatial heterogeneity should be considered for accurate interpretation, the evaluation of PD-L1 CNAs provides more reproducible results than that of protein expression levels especially with regard to intratumoral heterogeneity.
Authors: Anna Grenda; Paweł Krawczyk; Tomasz Kucharczyk; Justyna Błach; Katarzyna Reszka; Izabela Chmielewska; Jarosław Buczkowski; Robert Kieszko; Jan Siwiec; Tomasz Kubiatowski; Aleksandra Bożyk; Kinga Krukowska; Bożena Jarosz; Iwona Paśnik; Juliusz Pankowski; Daria Świniuch; Katarzyna Stencel; Michał Gil; Kinga Lew; Rodryg Ramlau; Aleksandra Szczęsna; Sebastian Fidler; Andrzej Sieracki; Andrzej Każarnowicz; Piotr Serwatowski; Tomasz Grodzki; Janusz Milanowski Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Filiz Oezkan; Stephan Eisenmann; Kaid Darwiche; Asmae Gassa; David P Carbone; Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Mohammed S I Mansour; Kajsa Ericson Lindquist; Tomas Seidal; Ulrich Mager; Rikard Mohlin; Lena Tran; Kim Hejny; Benjamin Holmgren; Despoina Violidaki; Katalin Dobra; Annika Dejmek; Maria Planck; Hans Brunnström Journal: Acta Cytol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.319
Authors: Steven Bozinovski; Amanda Vannitamby; Kanishka Rangamuwa; Savreet Aujla; Hao Wang; Christian Aloe; Louis Irving; Tracy T Leong; Daniel P Steinfort Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2021-06