Literature DB >> 31319943

A machine learning approach for predicting urine output after fluid administration.

Pei-Chen Lin1, Hsu-Cheng Huang2, Matthieu Komorowski3, Wei-Kai Lin4, Chun-Min Chang4, Kuan-Ta Chen4, Yu-Chuan Li5, Ming-Chin Lin6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine learning model to predict urine output (UO) in sepsis patients after fluid resuscitation.
METHODS: We identified sepsis patients in the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care-III v1.4 database according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. We focused on two outcomes: whether the UO decreased after fluid administration and whether oliguria (defined as UO less than the threshold of 0.5 mL/kg/h) developed. A gradient tree-based machine learning model implemented with an eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm was used to integrate relevant physiological parameters for predicting the aforementioned outcomes. A confusion matrix was computed.
RESULTS: A total of 232,929 events in 19,275 patients were included. Using decreased UO as the outcome measure, the optimal model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86; for predicting oliguria, most models achieved an AUC greater than 0.86, and the highest sensitivity was 92.2% when the model was applied to patients with baseline oliguria.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning could help clinicians evaluate fluid status in sepsis patients after fluid administration, thus preventing fluid overload-related complications.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support; Electronic health records; Fluid resuscitation; Machine learning; Prediction; Sepsis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31319943     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  7 in total

1.  Clinical management of sepsis can be improved by artificial intelligence: no.

Authors:  José Garnacho-Montero; Ignacio Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Jessica M Schwartz; Amanda J Moy; Sarah C Rossetti; Noémie Elhadad; Kenrick D Cato
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Outcome of acute kidney injury: how to make a difference?

Authors:  Matthieu Jamme; Matthieu Legrand; Guillaume Geri
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  Predicting 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III patients with sepsis-3: a machine learning approach using XGboost.

Authors:  Nianzong Hou; Mingzhe Li; Lu He; Bing Xie; Lin Wang; Rumin Zhang; Yong Yu; Xiaodong Sun; Zhengsheng Pan; Kai Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 5.  State of the Art of Machine Learning-Enabled Clinical Decision Support in Intensive Care Units: Literature Review.

Authors:  Na Hong; Chun Liu; Jianwei Gao; Lin Han; Fengxiang Chang; Mengchun Gong; Longxiang Su
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  A machine learning-based risk stratification tool for in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Cida Luo; Yi Zhu; Zhou Zhu; Ranxi Li; Guoqin Chen; Zhang Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 7.  Machine Learning for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Eric Mlodzinski; David J Stone; Leo A Celi
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2020-02-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.