| Literature DB >> 31319810 |
Ahmed Dahiru Balami1, Salmiah Md Said2, Nor Afiah Mohd Zulkefli2, Norsa'adah Bachok3, Emmanuel Luke Balami4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleeping under a long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) is recommended for all pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa, due to the high prevalence of malaria infection and its associated complications in the region. Despite this, LLIN use has still remained sub-optimal among pregnant women in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Understanding the interplay of factors influencing this important health behaviour would guide the development of interventions to promote its adoption.Entities:
Keywords: Behaviour; Information-motivation-behavioural skills (IMB) model; Long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN); Pregnant women
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31319810 PMCID: PMC6637635 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0803-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol ISSN: 1471-2288 Impact factor: 4.615
Fig. 1The Information-Motivation-Behavioural Skills Model. It focuses on three components which result in a behavioural change, which are: relevant information on the desired behaviour; the second is appropriate motivation to carry out such behaviours, while the third is ensuring that the individual is equipped with the necessary skills and competencies to carry out the desired behaviours
Respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics (N = 380)
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age group (years) | ||
| 26 and below | 208 | 54.7 |
| 27 and above | 172 | 45.3 |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Kanuri | 136 | (35.8) |
| Hausa | 59 | (15.5) |
| Babur | 33 | (8.7) |
| Fulani | 39 | (10.3) |
| Others | 113 | (29.7) |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
| Education | ||
| None | 156 | (41.1) |
| Primary | 67 | (17.6) |
| Secondary | 108 | (28.4) |
| Tertiary | 49 | (12.9) |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
| Occupation status | ||
| Employed | 172 | (45.3) |
| Not employed | 208 | (54.7) |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
| Income level | ||
| Below minimum wage | 351 | (92.4) |
| At/above minimum wage | 29 | (7.6) |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
| Type of residence | ||
| Permanent resident | 279 | (73.4) |
| Internally displaced | 101 | (26.6) |
| Total | 380 | (100.0) |
Association between socio-demographic factors and frequency of ITN use
| Variables | Age group |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 years and below | 27 years and above | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 2.872 | 4 | 0.579 | ||||
| Never | 123 | (59.1) | 95 | (55.2) | |||
| Seldom | 17 | (8.2) | 12 | (7.0) | |||
| Sometimes | 16 | (7.7) | 20 | (11.6) | |||
| Often | 24 | (11.5) | 25 | (14.5) | |||
| Almost always | 28 | (13.5) | 20 | (11.6) | |||
| Ethnicity | |||||||
| Kanuri | Others | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 4.165 | 4 | 0.384 | ||||
| Never | 80 | (58.8) | 138 | (56.6) | |||
| Seldom | 7 | (5.1) | 22 | (9.0) | |||
| Sometimes | 15 | (11.0) | 21 | (8.6) | |||
| Often | 14 | (10.3) | 35 | (14.3) | |||
| Almost always | 20 | (14.7) | 28 | (11.5) | |||
| Education | |||||||
| None | Educated | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 2.559 | 4 | 0.634 | ||||
| Never | 90 | (57.7) | 128 | (57.1) | |||
| Seldom | 8 | (5.1) | 21 | (9.4) | |||
| Sometimes | 16 | (10.3) | 20 | (8.90 | |||
| Often | 21 | (13.5) | 28 | (12.5) | |||
| Almost always | 21 | (13.5) | 27 | (12.1) | |||
| Employment status | |||||||
| Unemployed | Employed | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 7.458 | 4 | 0.114 | ||||
| Never | 126 | (59.4) | 92 | (54.8) | |||
| Seldom | 17 | (8.0) | 12 | (7.1) | |||
| Sometimes | 25 | (11.8) | 11 | 96.5) | |||
| Often | 22 | (10.4) | 27 | (16.1) | |||
| Almost always | 22 | (10.4) | 26 | (15.5) | |||
| Income level | |||||||
| Below min. Wage | At/above min wage | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 2.669 | 4 | 0.615 | ||||
| Never | 203 | (57.8) | 15 | (51.7) | |||
| Seldom | 26 | (7.4) | 3 | (10.3) | |||
| Sometimes | 35 | (10.0) | 1 | (3.4) | |||
| Often | 44 | (12.5) | 5 | (17.2) | |||
| Almost always | 43 | (12.3) | 5 | (17.2) | |||
| Residence type | |||||||
| Permanent resident | IDP | ||||||
| Freq. ITN use | 6.297 | 4 | 0.178 | ||||
| Never | 157 | (56.3) | 61 | (60.4) | |||
| Seldom | 26 | (9.3) | 3 | (3.0) | |||
| Sometimes | 29 | (10.4) | 7 | (6.9) | |||
| Often | 35 | (12.5) | 14 | (13.9) | |||
| Almost always | 35 | (12.5) | 14 | (13.9) | |||
Reliability and validity of constructs
| Construct | Items | Outer Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioural Skills | B_SKILLS_1 | 0.532 | 0.79 | 0.857 | 0.553 |
| B_SKILLS_2 | 0.654 | ||||
| B_SKILLS_3 | 0.817 | ||||
| B_SKILLS_4 | 0.828 | ||||
| B_SKILLS_5 | 0.837 | ||||
| Motivation | MOT1 | 0.829 | 0.784 | 0.872 | 0.694 |
| MOT2 | 0.826 | ||||
| MOT3 | 0.843 | ||||
| Information | TOTAL_INFO | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Behaviour | BEHAVIOUR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Variance inflation factor
| Behaviour | 1 |
|---|---|
| B_SKILLS_1 | 1.151 |
| B_SKILLS_2 | 1.482 |
| B_SKILLS_3 | 1.984 |
| B_SKILLS_4 | 2.038 |
| B_SKILLS_5 | 2.115 |
| MOT1 | 1.875 |
| MOT2 | 1.816 |
| MOT3 | 1.436 |
| Total_Info | 1 |
Fig. 2Path model of the IMB constructs
Path coefficients and hypothesis testing: direct effect
| Original Sample (O) | Sample Mean (M) | Standard Deviation | T Statistic (|O/STDEV|) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infromation - > Behaviour | 0.22 | 0.219 | 0.049 | 4.522 | < 0.001 |
| Motivation - > Behaviour | 0.108 | 0.109 | 0.059 | 1.839 | 0.033 |
| Infromation - > Behavioural skills | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.048 | 6.083 | < 0.001 |
| Motivation - > Behavioural skills | 0.369 | 0.372 | 0.048 | 7.673 | < 0.001 |
| Behavioural skills - > Behaviour | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.053 | 0.589 | 0.278 |
Path coefficients and hypothesis testing: indirect effect
| Original Sample (O) | Sample Mean (M) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infromation - > Behaviour | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.58 | 0.281 |
| Motivation - > Behaviour | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.02 | 0.576 | 0.282 |