| Literature DB >> 31319511 |
Shunwei Zhu1, Hujun Jia2, Xingyu Wang1, Yuan Liang1, Yibo Tong1, Tao Li1, Yang Yintang1.
Abstract
An improved multi-recessed double-recessed p-buffer layer 4H-SiC metal semiconductor field effect transistor (IMRD 4H-SiC MESFET) with high power added efficiency is proposed and studied by co-simulation of advanced design system (ADS) and technology computer aided design (TCAD) Sentaurus software in this paper. Based on multi-recessed double-recessed p-buffer layer 4H-SiC metal semiconductor field effect transistor (MRD 4H-SiC MESFET), the recessed area of MRD MESFET on both sides of the gate is optimized, the direct current (DC), radio frequency (RF) parameters and efficiency of the device is balanced, and the IMRD MESFET with a best power-added efficiency (PAE) is finally obtained. The results show that the PAE of the IMRD MESFET is 68.33%, which is 28.66% higher than the MRD MESFET, and DC and RF performance have not dropped significantly. Compared with the MRD MESFET, the IMRD MESFET has a broader prospect in the field of microwave radio frequency.Entities:
Keywords: 4H-SiC; IMRD structure; MESFET; power added efficiency
Year: 2019 PMID: 31319511 PMCID: PMC6680998 DOI: 10.3390/mi10070479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Schematic cross sections of the (a) MRD 4H-SiC metal semiconductor field effect transistor (MESFET), (b) improved multi-recessed double-recessed p-buffer layer (IMRD) 4H-SiC MESFET.
Common parameters of the two structures.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| P-Buffer Concentration | 1.4 × 1015 cm−3 |
| N-Channel Concentration | 3 × 1017 cm−3 |
| N-Cap layers Concentration | 2 × 1019 cm−3 |
| 0.5 μm | |
| 1.0 μm | |
| 0.5 μm | |
| 0.5 μm | |
| 0.7 μm | |
| N-Channel Thickness | 0.25 μm |
| P-Buffer Thickness | 0.5 μm |
| Device Area (without SI-Substrate) | 1 μm × 3.5 μm |
Figure 2One Tone Load Pull Schematic for power-added efficiency (PAE) measurements.
Figure 3The effect of the (a) length and (b) height on PAE.
Comparison of performance parameters of the two structures.
| Parameters | MRD MESFET | IMRD MESFET |
|---|---|---|
| 358.97 | 233.02 | |
| 73.45 | 56.37 | |
| −5.81 | −6.89 | |
| 0.128 | 0.13 | |
| 0.39 | 0.02 | |
| Power-added efficiency (PAE) (%) | 53.11 | 70.85 |
Figure 4The effect of the (a) length and (b) height on Idsat.
Figure 5The effect of recessed region parameters on Vt, Gmmax and Cgs. (a) Vt-L. (b) Vt-H. (c) Gmmax-L. (d) Gmmax-H. (e) C-L. (f) C-H.