Literature DB >> 31318495

Detection of early anastomotic leakage by intraperitoneal microdialysis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

M B Ellebaek1,2, H B Rahr3, S Boye4, C Fristrup1, N Qvist1.   

Abstract

AIM: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Early detection and intervention can improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare intraperitoneal microdialysis with a clinical scoring system for early detection of AL.
METHOD: A microdialysis catheter was anchored near the anastomosis at low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Peritoneal fluid samples were analysed (lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol concentration) 4-hourly and compared with a daily clinical leak score (DULK = Dutch leakage). At day 7 a pelvic CT with rectal contrast enema was performed to establish if there had been a radiological leak.
RESULTS: In this two-centre study, 129 patients [median age 65 (26-82) years; 60.5% male] underwent LAR. The leak rate was 27% (grade A, n = 11; grade B, n = 12; grade C, n = 12). Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated a lactate cut-off value of 9.8 mm and had 77% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 78% accuracy, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 58, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88 (CI 79-94) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9 for AL. This compared with a clinical score ≥ 4, which had 57% sensitivity, 79% specificity, 71% accuracy, a PPV of 46, a NPV of 82 and an AUC of 0.7 for AL. The mean day for a positive test when using delta lactate ≥ 6.3 mm was 1.6 days and for leak score ≥ 4 it was 3.3 days (NS).
CONCLUSION: When AL occurs, intraperitoneal lactate concentration increases over time, and at a certain cut-off has a higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV than a clinical scoring system. Colorectal Disease
© 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; low anterior resection; peritoneal microdialysis; rectal cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31318495     DOI: 10.1111/codi.14781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  The Science of Anastomotic Healing.

Authors:  Ryan B Morgan; Benjamin D Shogan
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-03-08

2.  Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study.

Authors:  Jacob Damgaard Eriksen; Henriette Vind Thaysen; Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen; Anders Husted Madsen; Anders Tøttrup; Charlotte Buchard Nørager; Ken Ljungmann; Niels Thomassen; Conor Patrick Delaney; Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Left colic artery diameter is an important factor affecting anastomotic blood supply in sigmoid colon cancer or rectal cancer surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bo Li; Jianan Wang; Shaohui Yang; Jie Shen; Qi Li; Qiqi Zhu; Wei Cui
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.253

Review 4.  Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers of Anastomotic Leakage: A Precision Medicine Approach for Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mark Gray; Jamie R K Marland; Alan F Murray; David J Argyle; Mark A Potter
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.