Literature DB >> 31317563

Analysis of different phase unwrapping methods to optimize quantitative susceptibility mapping in the abdomen.

Eric Bechler1, Julia Stabinska1, Hans-Jörg Wittsack1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is heavily impacted by phase processing of gradient echo imaging data. So far, phase unwrapping algorithms have mostly been developed and tested for neuroimaging applications. In this work, a numerical human abdomen phantom was created and used to assess the feasibility of different phase unwrapping algorithms in abdominal QSM. Furthermore, in vivo data were acquired to evaluate consistency with the simulations.
METHODS: Laplacian-based, quality-guided region growing and graph-cuts unwrapping techniques were evaluated using the numerical phantom as well as an in vivo measurement. As a quality metric, root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated in order to analyze the performance of the examined unwrapping algorithms. Subsequently, susceptibility maps were generated from the resulting phase maps and compared to the ground truth. The evaluation was carried out on the whole phantom as well as individual organs.
RESULTS: Graph-cuts led to the most accurate and robust results among the investigated unwrapping methods. The other algorithms showed severe errors in regions with large susceptibility changes (i.e., around the lungs). Deviations from the ground-truth susceptibility were higher than in the previous brain simulations for all tested algorithms.
CONCLUSION: Graph-cuts-based unwrapping algorithms should be preferred in QSM studies in the human abdomen, where large susceptibility changes occur. For further improvement of QSM studies, unwrapping algorithms should be optimized for abdominal applications.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QSM; phase processing; phase unwrapping; quantitative susceptibility mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31317563     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  2 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of the cardiovascular system: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Li Huang; Andrew Tyler; Andrea Barison; Nicola Martini; Luigi F Saccaro; Sébastien Roujol; Pier-Giorgio Masci
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.903

2.  Feasibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of the human kidney.

Authors:  Eric Bechler; Julia Stabinska; Thomas Thiel; Jonas Jasse; Romans Zukovs; Birte Valentin; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Alexandra Ljimani
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.