Literature DB >> 31317014

Endpoint surrogacy in oncological randomized controlled trials with immunotherapies: a systematic review of trial-level and arm-level meta-analyses.

Jianrong Zhang1,2, Wenhua Liang3, Hengrui Liang3, Xiaofei Wang2, Jianxing He3.   

Abstract

Few cancer drugs or their indications achieved survival benefit in subsequent trials during postmarket period after approval based on surrogate endpoints. This causes a concern of using surrogate endpoints instead of overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint for trial design, implementation and regulation approval. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the findings from published meta-analyses which have evaluated endpoint surrogacy for OS in oncological randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with immunotherapies. After searching articles indexed in PubMed prior to 24 February 2019, we identified a total of 11 meta-analyses for advanced multiple tumors, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma; most (91%; 10/11) focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although the evaluation criteria adopted by these meta-analyses for validating endpoint surrogacy were not consistent (ranging from R2 ≥0.60 to R2 ≥0.80), the results were consistent. Few studies show an association between OS and progression-free survival (PFS)/objective response rate (ORR) that met the lowest evaluation criteria (R2 ≥0.60), based on treatment effects (8%; 2/26 indications) or absolute results from experimental arm (0%; 0/11 indications). However, the association between OS and 1-year survival rate met the lowest criteria based on both the trial-level results (4/4 indications) and the arm-level results (5/5 indications). In lieu of this finding, we are supportive of an alternative endpoint, e.g., 1-year survival rate, rather than the more conventional choices PFS and ORR, as promising surrogate endpoint for OS in immunotherapy RCTs. We encourage further investigation on endpoint surrogacy based on the same or different settings, especially an assessment on survival rate at milestone time (e.g., 1-year), which has been demonstrated valuable for predicting OS in meta-analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surrogate endpoints; cancer; immunotherapies; randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31317014      PMCID: PMC6603357          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  3 in total

1.  Pre-Treatment Tumor Growth Rate Predicts Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy.

Authors:  Li-Na He; Xuanye Zhang; Haifeng Li; Tao Chen; Chen Chen; Yixin Zhou; Zuan Lin; Wei Du; Wenfeng Fang; Yunpeng Yang; Yan Huang; Hongyun Zhao; Shaodong Hong; Li Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings.

Authors:  Tiantian Hua; Yuan Gao; Ruyang Zhang; Yongyue Wei; Feng Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Sample size calculation for randomized selection trials with a time-to-event endpoint and a margin of practical equivalence.

Authors:  Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Andrew Embleton-Thirsk; Zachary Ryan McCaw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.