| Literature DB >> 31316513 |
Sarah M Lomeli-Martinez1,2, Eulogio Valentin-Goméz3,4, Juan J Varela-Hernández5, Monserrat Alvarez-Zavala6, Karina Sanchez-Reyes6, Moises Ramos-Solano6, Rodolfo I Cabrera-Silva6, Victor M Ramirez-Anguiano7, Manuel A Lomeli-Martinez1, Silvia Y Martinez-Salazar5, Luz A González-Hernández6,8, Jaime F Andrade-Villanueva6,8.
Abstract
Background: Chronic periodontitis (CP), caused by bacteria and fungi, appears in up to 66% of HIV-patients. The impact and association of HIV-treatment (HAART) and Candida itself has not been properly evaluated in the development and progression of CP. The immunopathogenesis is characterized by CD4+ T-cells activation and the balance between the T-helper 1 (Th1) and T-helper 2 (Th2) or a mixed cytokine profile. Currently, the associated causes of an immune response in HIV-patients with CP is controversial. Our aims were the determination of Candida spp. and cytokine profile in oral samples from HIV-positive patients with CP, considering the CD4+ T cells levels and HAART use.Entities:
Keywords: Candida spp; HAART; HIV; chronic periodontitis; cytokines
Year: 2019 PMID: 31316513 PMCID: PMC6610488 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Primer sets used for Candida spp. PCR detection.
| INT1 5′ AAGTATTTGGGAGAAGGGAAAGGG 3′ | ( | |
| INT2 5′ AAAATGGGCATTAAGGAAAAGAGC 3′ | ||
| CTf 5′ TGATAGTTAGGAAAGATCAGGTG 3′ | ( | |
| CTr 5′ CACACACATGGGATATGTT 3′ | ||
| CGf 5′ ACATATGTTTGCTGAAAAGGC 3′ | ( | |
| CGr 5′ AGAAGTCCTGAACACTAAGAAAAAGT 3′ | ||
| CPf 5′ AGGGATTGCCAATATGCCCA 3′ | ( | |
| CPr 5′ GTGACATTGTGTAGATCCTTGG 3′ |
Figure 1Flowchart of patient recruitment and distribution. Two hundred twenty-eight patients were selected after exclusion criteria and separated into four groups. Due to low quality in saliva samples, we were not able to determine the cytokines profile in the samples from all patients included in this study.
Sociodemographic characteristics including all patients.
| Age (years) | 37.3 ± 9 | 36.9 ± 8 | 37 ± 12 | 42.6 ± 11 | 0.05 |
| Mean (SD) | |||||
| Gender | 0.05 | ||||
| Female | 10 (19%) | 1 (2%) | 11 (22%) | 15 (22%) | |
| Male | 43 (81%) | 56 (98%) | 39 (78%) | 53 (78%) | |
| Tobacco use: | ns | ||||
| Yes | 34 (64%) | 38 (67%) | 31 (62%) | 47 (69%) | |
| No | 19 (36%) | 19 (33%) | 19 (38%) | 21 (31%) | |
| Drugs use: | ns | ||||
| Yes | 34 (64%) | 31 (54%) | 24 (48%) | 41 (60%) | |
| No | 19 (36%) | 26 (46%) | 26 (52%) | 27 (40%) | |
| Alcohol use: | ns | ||||
| Yes | 40 (76%) | 41 (72%) | 38 (76%) | 53 (78%) | |
| No | 13 (24%) | 16 (28%) | 12 (24%) | 15 (22%) | |
| Diabetes: | ns | ||||
| Present | 2 (4%) | 4 (7%) | 2 (4%) | 4 (6%) | |
| Absent | 51 (96%) | 53 (93%) | 48 (96%) | 64 (94%) | |
| CD4 + (cells/mL) | 41 | 38 | 366 | 503 | 0.0001 |
| Median (IQR) | (11–109) | (19–89) | (264–552) | (354–697) | |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.0001 |
| Median (IQR) | (0.05–0.17) | (0.05–0.16) | (0.25–0.67) | (0.40–0.77) | |
| Viral load (copies/mL) | 31,400 | 149,000 | 30,600 | 38 | 0.0001 |
| Median (IQR) | (428–297,250) | (57,800–411,436) | (183–77,750) | (20–78) | |
| Type of HAART: | ns | ||||
| No medication | – | 100% | 100% | – | |
| PI-based | 19 (36%) | – | – | 23 (34%) | |
| NNRT-based | 18 (34%) | – | – | 33 (48%) | |
| INI-based | 7 (13%) | – | – | 4 (6%) | |
| Other | 9 (17%) | – | – | 8 (12%) | |
| Duration in treatment (months) | 17 (6–23) | – | – | 38 (24–104) | 0.0001 |
| CAL classification: | |||||
| Mild | 7 (13.2%) | 7 (12.2%) | 13 (26%) | 12 (17.6%) | 0.05 |
| Moderate | 15 (28.3%) | 14 (24.5%) | 17 (34%) | 24 (35.2%) | ns |
| Severe | 31 (58.4%) | 36 (63.1%) | 20 (40%) | 32 (47%) | 0.05 |
Fisher's exact test, Chi-squared test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U-tests.
Statistical significance was found only with Group B because it only had one female patient; however, between the rest of the groups, there were no statistical differences; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; ns, no significance. Group A: ≤ 200 CD4.
Figure 2Candida spp. identification by methods. All samples were cultivated first in CHROMagar for initial identification. Afterward, all identified Candida spp. by traditional microbiologic methods were evaluated by PCR technique to confirm the species. If the PCR for the specific species found in CHROMagar was negative, further PCRs were made for other Candida spp. Any Candida spp. that was not confirmed by PCR, due to lack of the primers specific for that species, were identified through MALDI-TOF technique.
Capacity of Candida spp. identification with CHROMagar Candida Medium.
| Sensibility | 95% | 89.8–97.9% |
| Specificity | 68% | 55.6–79.1% |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 2.98 | 2.09–4.26 |
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.07 | 0.04–0.16 |
| Positive predictive value | 86% | 81.4–89.9% |
| Negative predictive value | 87% | 75.4–93.1% |
| Accuracy | 86% | 80.8–90.7% |
Patients with presence of Candida spp. in each group.
| A vs. C | |||||
| B vs. C | |||||
| D vs. C | |||||
| 26 (49) | 27 (47) | 11 (22) | 29 (43) | A vs. C | |
| B vs. C | |||||
| D vs. C | |||||
| 9 (17) | 11 (19) | 2 (4) | 15 (22) | B vs. C | |
| D vs. C | |||||
| 0 (0) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 5 (7) | ns | |
| 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | ns | |
| 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | n/a |
Groups were compared between each other for overall Candida infection and for each individual Candida spp. detected. Total Candida identification is shown with their percentage (round up) for every group. Statistically significant p-values are shown. For C. dubliniensis, the statistical comparison was not performed because only one group had this species (n/a). As not every patient in each group had Candida, the amount of Candida spp. detected and total patient per group differs.
Chi-squared test;
Fisher's exact test;
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001; ns, no statistical significance.
Cytokine levels in saliva samples from HIV+ patients per group.
| IFN-γ | 11.79 (7.10–25.21) | 7.89 (6.63–23.39) | 7.07 (6.0–17.23) | 7.07 (3.31–8.23) | A vs. D |
| B vs. D | |||||
| TNF-α | 5.35 (5.05–9.54) | 5.05 (4.03–8.77) | 5.05 (4.57–7.54) | 5.05 (1.98–5.25) | A vs. D |
| IL-2 | 15.18 (15.18–19.65) | 15.18 (4.84–15.18) | 15.18 (4.84–16.47) | 15.18 (4.84–16.32) | A vs. B |
| IL-6 | 19.03 (4.26–59.96) | 40.79 (5.09–145) | 4.83 (2.43–28.91) | 4.82 (3.37–5.37) | B vs. D |
| B vs. C | |||||
| IL-4 | 15.65 (5.79–33.63) | 9.9 (5.17–36.85) | 5.75 (2.27–13.75) | 5.17 (2.13–9.89) | A vs. D |
| A vs. C | |||||
| B vs. D | |||||
| IL-5 | 4.08 (4.08–10.39) | 4.08 (2.98–4.08) | 4.08 (2.98–4.08) | 4.08 (2.98–4.08) | A vs. D |
| A vs. B | |||||
| IL-10 | 2.89 (2.83–11.22) | 4.17 (2.83–13.53) | 2.83 (2.39–4.25) | 2.83 (2.27–2.87) | A vs. D |
| B vs. D | |||||
| IL-13 | 13.48 (12.47–17.81) | 12.47 (5.49–17.81) | 13.08 (5.45–23.68) | 8.43 (3.81–15.16) | ns |
Measurements of Th1 and Th2 profile's cytokines levels in all groups. All values are reported in pg/mL. Median and interquartile range (IQR) are shown. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate differences. The p-values with statistical significance are reported as follows:
p < 0.5;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001; ns, no statistical significance.
Figure 3Proposal of the immune response in HIV patients with CP. (A) Suggests the progression to CP in the oral cavity while (B) shows a proposal for the involvement of CP in the systemic inflammation environment of HIV patients. Created with BioRender.