| Literature DB >> 31316454 |
Ole Hensel1, Philipp Burow1, Stephan Mages1, Andreas Wienke2, Torsten Kraya1, Stephan Zierz1.
Abstract
Introduction: "Headache attributed to ingestion or inhalation of a cold stimulus" (HICS) is one of the most common primary headache disorders. Little is known about the pathophysiology of HICS and other headache disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze mean flow velocity (MFV) and cerebrovascular resistance (RI) in both middle cerebral arteries (MCA) upon ingestion of ice water.Entities:
Keywords: cerebrovascular resistance; ice cream headache; ingestion of cold stimuli; mean flow velocity; trigeminal-parasympathetic vasodilator reflex
Year: 2019 PMID: 31316454 PMCID: PMC6611440 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Study protocol: The velocity envelope of both middle cerebral arteries was continuously recorded. Start and end of ingestion and headache was marked in the recording. For analyses, this velocity data were averaged for resting period and end of stimulation period . The durations of these periods are given in heartbeats.
Cerebrovascular changes due to luke-warm and ice water ingestion (n = 77); mean in % (with 95% confidence interval).
| 2.8 | −5.1 | 21.3 | 27.0 | |
| No provoked HICS ( | 4.6 | −7.3 | 13.1 | 116.6 |
| Without HICS history ( | 3.9 | −6.6 | 14.0 | 107.3 |
| With HICS history ( | 6.6 | −9.4 | 10.8 | 142.4 |
| With provoked HICS ( | 9.3 | −6.6 | 8.5 | 220.0 |
HICS, Headache attributed to ingestion or inhalation of a cold stimulus; HR, heart rate; MFV, mean flow velocity in both middle cerebral arteries; RI in both middle cerebral arteries; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences;
different to luke-warm water stimuli by paired t-test;
different to volunteers without HICS by two sample t-test; bold values indicate significant difference.
Figure 2The ice water induced change of mean flow velocity (MFV) in middle cerebral artery (MCA, median ± standard deviation, 95% Confidence interval) in volunteers with and without lacrimation upon HICS (significant difference p = 0.006).