Literature DB >> 31316257

Pediatric elbow measurement parameters: Evaluation of the six angles in inter- and intra-observer reliability.

Purinon Suangyanon1, Ornusa Chalayon1, Kitti Worawuthangkul1, Kamolporn Kaewpornsawan1, Thanase Ariyawatkul1, Perajit Eamsobhana2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several radiographic measurements of the humerus can be used to evaluate the treatment outcome of supracondylar fractures in children. Because of the cartilaginous nature of the immature elbow, interpretation of radiographs around this area is sometimes challenging and can be unreliable. This study was conducted to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the six commonly used radiographic measurements of the distal humerus.
METHOD: The Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle and lateral capitellohumeral angle of the humerus were measured by two observers on the radiographs of uninjured elbows from 58 children. The values between each measurement were compared and correlated using a Pearson coefficient of correlation to determine the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability.
RESULTS: All of the radiographic parameters showed excellent intra-observer reliability with the correlation coefficient values of the Baumann angle, humero-ulna angle, metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle, radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, lateral capitellohumeral angle as 0.945, 0.95, 0.909, 0.888, 0.961 and 0.975 (p < 0.001), respectively. The inter-observer reliability of the Baumann and humero-ulna angles were also found to be highly correlated at r = 0.843 (p < 0.001) and 0.878 (p < 0.001), respectively. The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle had poor reliability with r = 0.136 (p = 0.291) while the radial epiphyseal angle, shaft-condylar angle, and lateral capitellohumeral angle demonstrated good reliability with r = 0.675 (p < 0.001), 0.747 (p < 0.001), and 0.686 (p < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Baumann angle and humero-ulna angle measurements of distal humerus showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. Both parameters represent repeatable and reliable methods for determining the outcome of supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baumann angle; Humero-ulna angle; Lateral capitellohumeral angle; Metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle; Radial-epiphyseal angle; Shaft-condylar angle

Year:  2018        PMID: 31316257      PMCID: PMC6612040          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  13 in total

1.  Baumann's confusing legacy.

Authors:  J D Acton; M A McNally
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Shaft-Condylar Angle for surgical correction in neglected and displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture in children.

Authors:  Pornchai Mulpruek; Chanika Angsanuntsukh; Patarawan Woratanarat; Paphon Sa-Ngasoongsong; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk; Pongsthorn Chanplakorn
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement.

Authors:  D L Skaggs; J M Hale; J Bassett; C Kaminsky; R M Kay; V T Tolo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The lateral capitellohumeral angle in normal children: mean, variation, and reliability in comparison to Baumann's angle.

Authors:  Craig F Shank; Brett P Wiater; James Lee Pace; Thomas M Jinguji; Gregory A Schmale; Rachel C L Bittner; Viviana Bompadre; Janna K Stults; Walter F Krengel
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus in Children.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Comparison between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pinning in children with closed totally displaced supracondylar humeral fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Kaewpornsawan
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Authors:  Reza Omid; Paul D Choi; David L Skaggs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The measurements and standardization of humerocondylar angle in children.

Authors:  Naum Simanovsky; Ron Lamdan; Nurit Hiller; Natalia Simanovsky
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Normal characteristics of the Baumann (humerocapitellar) angle: an aid in assessment of supracondylar fractures.

Authors:  D M Williamson; C J Coates; R K Miller; W G Cole
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Baumann angle of the humerus in children with supracondylar humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mauricio Silva; Rajeev Pandarinath; Eugene Farng; Samuel Park; Cherlyn Caneda; Yi-Jen Fong; Adam Penman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the shaft-condylar angle for an incomplete supracondylar fracture of elbow in children.

Authors:  Pawaris Sukvanich; Peen Samun; Pinkawas Kongmalai
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-04

2.  Comparison of Lateral and Crossed K-wires for Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bakhat Yawar; Mohammad Noah Khan; Ayeisha Asim; Ammal Qureshi; Ali Yawar; Ahmad Faraz; Andrew McAdam; Sami Mustafa; Brian Hanratty
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Geometric semi-automatic analysis of radiographs of Colles' fractures.

Authors:  Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro; Kwun Ho Ngan; Ananda Ananda; Artur d'Avila Garcez; Andrew Appelboam; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.