Literature DB >> 31315889

Minimal Effects of Proto-Y Chromosomes on House Fly Gene Expression in Spite of Evidence that Selection Maintains Stable Polygenic Sex Determination.

Jae Hak Son1, Tea Kohlbrenner2, Svenia Heinze2, Leo W Beukeboom3, Daniel Bopp2, Richard P Meisel4.   

Abstract

Sex determination, the developmental process by which organismal sex is established, evolves fast, often due to changes in the master regulators at the top of the pathway. Additionally, in species with polygenic sex determination, multiple different master regulators segregate as polymorphisms. Understanding the forces that maintain polygenic sex determination can be informative of the factors that drive the evolution of sex determination. The house fly, Musca domestica, is a well-suited model to those ends because natural populations harbor male-determining loci on each of the six chromosomes and a biallelic female determiner. To investigate how natural selection maintains polygenic sex determination in the house fly, we assayed the phenotypic effects of proto-Y chromosomes by performing mRNA-sequencing experiments to measure gene expression in house fly males carrying different proto-Y chromosomes. We find that the proto-Y chromosomes have similar effects as a nonsex-determining autosome. In addition, we created sex-reversed males without any proto-Y chromosomes and they had nearly identical gene expression profiles as genotypic males. Therefore, the proto-Y chromosomes have a minor effect on male gene expression, consistent with previously described minimal X-Y sequence differences. Despite these minimal differences, we find evidence for a disproportionate effect of one proto-Y chromosome on male-biased expression, which could be partially responsible for fitness differences between males with different proto-Y chromosome genotypes. Therefore our results suggest that, if natural selection maintains polygenic sex determination in house fly via gene expression differences, the phenotypes under selection likely depend on a small number of genetic targets.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-seq; diptera; gene expression; insect; sex chromosome; sex determination; sexual antagonism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31315889      PMCID: PMC6727804          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  56 in total

1.  Genetic transformation of the housefly Musca domestica with the lepidopteran derived transposon piggyBac.

Authors:  M Hediger; M Niessen; E A Wimmer; A Dübendorfer; D Bopp
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.585

2.  Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Male sex in houseflies is determined by Mdmd, a paralog of the generic splice factor gene CWC22.

Authors:  Akash Sharma; Svenia D Heinze; Yanli Wu; Tea Kohlbrenner; Ian Morilla; Claudia Brunner; Ernst A Wimmer; Louis van de Zande; Mark D Robinson; Leo W Beukeboom; Daniel Bopp
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  MAINTENANCE OF THE THREE SEX CHROMOSOME POLYMORPHISM IN THE PLATYFISH, XIPHOPHORUS MACULATUS.

Authors:  Steven Hecht Orzack; Joel J Sohn; Klaus D Kallman; Simon A Levin; Ross Johnston
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  A cline in frequency of autosomal males is not associated with insecticide resistance in house fly (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Ronda L Hamm; Toshio Shono; Jeffrey G Scott
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Greg Gibson; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Molecular characterization of the key switch F provides a basis for understanding the rapid divergence of the sex-determining pathway in the housefly.

Authors:  Monika Hediger; Caroline Henggeler; Nicole Meier; Regina Perez; Giuseppe Saccone; Daniel Bopp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Transcriptome Differences between Alternative Sex Determining Genotypes in the House Fly, Musca domestica.

Authors:  Richard P Meisel; Jeffrey G Scott; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Visualizing the structure of RNA-seq expression data using grade of membership models.

Authors:  Kushal K Dey; Chiaowen Joyce Hsiao; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diversity of Modes of Reproduction and Sex Determination Systems in Invertebrates, and the Putative Contribution of Genetic Conflict.

Authors:  Marion Anne Lise Picard; Beatriz Vicoso; Stéphanie Bertrand; Hector Escriva
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Gene-Level, but Not Chromosome-Wide, Divergence between a Very Young House Fly Proto-Y Chromosome and Its Homologous Proto-X Chromosome.

Authors:  Jae Hak Son; Richard P Meisel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 16.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.