| Literature DB >> 31315294 |
Chao Liu1, Jian-Chun Wu1, Haitao Zhou2, Menghao Liu1, Dong Zhang1, Shilin Li1, Hongquan Gao1, Jianhong Yang3.
Abstract
The proton transfer mechanism on the class="Chemical">carbon cathode surfEntities:
Keywords: PANI nanofibers; Zn-ions; functionalized activated carbon; pH values; proton transfer mechanism
Year: 2019 PMID: 31315294 PMCID: PMC6680928 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24142589
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) SEM and TEM (b) images of the functionalized activated carbon cathode materials (FACs). (c) N2 isotherms and (d) pore size distributions (PSDs) of FACs, FACs200, FACs400, FACs600, FACs800, and carbon nanosponges (CNSs) calculated by nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT).
Figure 2(a) Solvated configurations of the SO42−·(H2O)12 cluster. Oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur are represented in red, purple, and yellow, respectively. The dotted lines indicate hydrogen bonds. (b) Plot of specific capacitance normalized by BET specific surface areas (SSA) for the carbons in this study (FACs and CNSs) and in the other study (FCNSs) with identical electrolytes. The normalized capacitance increased with increasing of HK micropores SSA ratio with two-stage linear simulation. (b insert) Drawings of solvated ions residing in pores with distance between adjacent pore walls of ~0.6 nm illustrate this behavior schematically.
Figure 3(a) FTIR spectra of six samples. υ, stretching; δ, bending (in-plane); γ, bending (out-of-plane); s, symmetric; as, asymmetric. (b) Experimental X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results of the six samples. (c) Comparison of the O1s deconvolutions for the six samples. (d) Comparison of the N1s deconvolutions for the five samples. (e) Schematic diagram of the FACs chemical structure.
Figure 4(a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the six samples obtained using the carbon positive electrode as working electrode, and the pure Zn foil as both the counter and reference electrodes at 5 mV s−1 and 0.3 to 1.8 V vs. Zn/Zn+. (b) Comparison between the changes of functions contents and the change of the average capacitances at 0.1 A g−1 for the five samples in the Zn-ion hybrid supercapacitors (SCs) with aqueous electrolyte. DFT simulation of the proton transfer process on the –OH group (c) and –NH group (d) from the initial adsorption state to the final relaxed state. (e) Separation of the capacitive currents (k1v, blue shadow area) and diffusion currents (k2v1/2, blank area) for the FACs positive electrode in the Zn-ion hybrid SCs with aqueous electrolyte at the scan rate of 5 mV s−1. (f) The diffusion and capacitive contribution ratio in the total intercalated charge as a function of sweet rates during CV processes for three SCs samples with pH values of 3, 5, and 7.
Figure 5(a) CV curves of the FACs-based Zn-ion hybrid SC obtained using the carbon positive electrode as working electrode, and the pure Zn foil as both the counter and reference electrodes at various scan rates of 1–50 mV s−1 and 0.3 to 1.8 V vs. Zn/Zn+. (b) Galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) curves of FACs-based Zn-ion hybrid SC at low current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1 A g−1 and (insert) high current densities of 2, 5, 10, 20 A g−1. (c) Rate capability: current density versus specific capacitance for the six samples. (d) Gravimetric Ragone plots of the Zn-ion hybrid SCs in aqueous electrolyte based on the mass of carbon positive electrode materials (FACs and CNSs) in this work, compared to the reported work by Dong et al. [18]. The estimated values of full device with thick electrode (120 μm) are also given. (e) Cycling stability of the FACs-based Zn-ion hybrid SC at 2 A g−1 for 10,000 cycles of charge-discharge.