| Literature DB >> 31315250 |
Valentina Sabatini1,2, Eleonora Pargoletti3,4, Valeria Comite3, Marco Aldo Ortenzi3,4,5, Paola Fermo3, Davide Gulotta6,7, Giuseppe Cappelletti3,4,5.
Abstract
In this work, new co- and ter-polymers of methyl methacrylate (MMA), ethyl methacrylate (EMA), and N-butyl methacrylate (nBuMA), containing just 1% mol × mol-1 of a fluorinated co-monomer, 3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluoro-octyl methacrylate (POMA), were synthesized. After an UV accelerated aging test, the photo-chemical stability of the polymers prepared was determined by 1H NMR and FT-IR spectroscopy, size exclusion chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry and wettability measurements. The polymers were applied to Botticino tiles to achieve better performances in terms of water repellency and consequently deterioration resistance. One-year prolonged exposure to a real environment was conducted and the properties of the coated materials and their performances were studied using different surface techniques such as water contact angle (WCA) and colorimetric measurements (CIELaB), capillary absorption, permeability (RVP) tests and soluble salts determination. The effectiveness of the fluorinated methacrylic coatings was clearly demonstrated; among all the resins, the co-polymer MMA_POMA seems to be the most performing one. Furthermore, both the UV photo-chemical resistance and the easiness of removal was successfully studied.Entities:
Keywords: Botticino marble protection; aging; fluorinated methacrylic polymer; outdoor exposure; photo-chemical stability
Year: 2019 PMID: 31315250 PMCID: PMC6681005 DOI: 10.3390/polym11071190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Synthetic route and loading of the reagents for all the synthesized polymers.
Figure 2Schematics of the exposure site indicating (a) the location; (b,c) the samples collected and (d) the methods used for the characterization of the samples.
Figure 31H-NMR (proton nuclear magnetic resonance) spectra of both unaged and ultra violet (UV) aged (a) MMA_POMA (methyl methacrylate_3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluoro-octyl methacrylate, (b) MMA_nBuMA_POMA (methyl methacrylate_ N-butyl methacrylate _3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluoro-octyl methacrylate) and (c) EMA_nBuMA_POMA samples (ethyl methacrylate_ N-butyl methacrylate _3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluoro-octyl methacrylate).
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC), thermal and water contact angle (WCA) data of the resins synthesized collected before and after the UV aging test.
| Samples | D | Tg | θ (°) | θ (°) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UV Aging | ||||||||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| MMA_POMA | 27000 | 25000 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 89 | 87 | 72 ± 2 | 74 ± 3 | 93 ± 1 | 91 ± 1 |
| MMA_nBuMA_POMA | 27000 | 22100 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 62 | 64 | 75 ± 1 | 73 ± 2 | 94 ± 2 | 94 ± 3 |
| EMA_nBuMA_POMA | 26800 | 23400 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 48 | 47 | 69 ± 2 | 72 ± 4 | 96 ± 4 | 92 ± 4 |
Figure 4Topographic profile of MMA_POMA-treated marble (MMA_POMA@B), as a representative sample. Roughness data are reported as average values with the relative standard deviations. The coatings thickness (highlighted by red arrows) were evaluated by scratching the films with a pin.
Comparison of WCA, colorimetric variation assessment (ΔE*), water capillary absorption by both the final quantity of water absorbed (Qft) and the capillary absorption (CA) coefficient, reduction percentage of vapor permeability (% RVP) relative to bare and coated marbles, before and after the outdoor exposure.
| Samples | WCA (°) | ΔE*(Treated-Bare) | Qft | CA | % RVP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Exposure | ||||||||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| B | 40 ± 6 | 70 ± 7 | − | − | 28.7 | 32.7 | 0.143 | 0.102 | − | − |
| MMA_POMA@B | 90 ± 3 | 77 ± 7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 24 | 30 |
| MMA_nBuMA_POMA@B | 82 ± 1 | 83 ± 4 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 9.8 | 1.3 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 23 | 25 |
| EMA_nBuMA_POMA@B | 82 ± 2 | 80 ± 4 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 42 | 53 |
Figure 5(a) Water capillary absorption and (b) water vapor permeability tests by differently POMA-clad Botticino substrates.
Average concentrations of sulphate and nitrate anions determined on the B substrates exposed at the terrace of the Duomo cathedral during the one-year exposure.
| Samples | Anions (µg × cm−2) | |
|---|---|---|
| NO3− | SO42− | |
| B | 20 ± 5 | 24 ± 8 |
| MMA_POMA@B | 21 ± 5 | 7 ± 4 |
| MMA_nBuMA_POMA@B | 44 ± 7 | 2 ± 1 |
| EMA_nBuMA_POMA@B | 19 ± 4 | 9 ± 1 |
Figure 6Cleaned marble tiles coated by (a) MMA_POMA, (b) MMA_nBuMA_POMA, (c) EMA_nBuMA_POMA resins and (d) table showing WCA, the final amount of water absorbed by capillarity, slopes of the vapor permeability curves measured on cleaned-up Botticino tiles. About EMA_nBuMA_POMA coating removed after the external exposure: (e) FT-IR spectra of both soluble and insoluble coating fractions.
Figure 7SEC curves of (a) MMA_POMA and (b) MMA_nBuMA_POMA resins before and after the external exposure test; (c) comparison of MMA_POMA and MMA_nBuMA_POMA molecular weights and thermal data before and after the exposure.