K R Schache1, P L Hofman2, A S Serlachius1. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
AIM: Cost-effective psychosocial interventions that can feasibly be implemented into busy clinical settings are needed to improve psychological and physical health outcomes in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. We examined the efficacy of a gratitude journalling intervention to improve psychological well-being and glycaemic control in adolescents aged 10-16 years with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS:Eighty adolescents were randomized to the 8-week gratitude intervention (N = 40) or standard care (N = 40). Self-reported measures of stress, quality of life, self-care, depression and gratitude were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks after baseline. Glycaemic control (HbA1c ) was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks after baseline. A per-protocol analysis was conducted with the adolescents who completed all questionnaires (N = 60). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine differences between treatment arms at follow-up adjusting for baseline scores. RESULTS: There was no evidence of any between-group differences in the psychological or behavioural measures at follow-up (all P-values > 0.05). Glycaemic control slightly increased in the control group while remaining stable in the gratitude group, with a between-group difference of 6.1 mmol/mol [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.6 to 14.7; 0.6%, 95% CI -0.2 to 1.3] at 12 weeks after baseline. After adjusting for baseline HbA1c , this between-group difference was significant (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized trial of a gratitude journalling intervention for adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Gratitude journalling interventions represent a clinically usable approach. If and how it helps to stabilise glycaemic control in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes remains to be confirmed in future research.
RCT Entities:
AIM: Cost-effective psychosocial interventions that can feasibly be implemented into busy clinical settings are needed to improve psychological and physical health outcomes in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. We examined the efficacy of a gratitude journalling intervention to improve psychological well-being and glycaemic control in adolescents aged 10-16 years with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Eighty adolescents were randomized to the 8-week gratitude intervention (N = 40) or standard care (N = 40). Self-reported measures of stress, quality of life, self-care, depression and gratitude were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks after baseline. Glycaemic control (HbA1c ) was assessed at baseline and 12 weeks after baseline. A per-protocol analysis was conducted with the adolescents who completed all questionnaires (N = 60). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine differences between treatment arms at follow-up adjusting for baseline scores. RESULTS: There was no evidence of any between-group differences in the psychological or behavioural measures at follow-up (all P-values > 0.05). Glycaemic control slightly increased in the control group while remaining stable in the gratitude group, with a between-group difference of 6.1 mmol/mol [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.6 to 14.7; 0.6%, 95% CI -0.2 to 1.3] at 12 weeks after baseline. After adjusting for baseline HbA1c , this between-group difference was significant (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized trial of a gratitude journalling intervention for adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Gratitude journalling interventions represent a clinically usable approach. If and how it helps to stabilise glycaemic control in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes remains to be confirmed in future research.
Authors: Anna Serlachius; Anna Boggiss; David Lim; Kiralee Schache; Kate Wallace-Boyd; Jennifer Brenton-Peters; Elise Buttenshaw; Stephanie Chadd; Alana Cavadino; Nicholas Cao; Eva Morunga; Hiran Thabrew Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2021-10-01