| Literature DB >> 31314809 |
Henry Omoregie Egharevba1, Omolola Fatokun1, Mercy Aboh1, Olobayo Olufunso Kunle1, Solomon Nwaka2, Karniyus Shingu Gamaniel1.
Abstract
A confounding factor for healthcare programmes in African countries is the inability of essential health tools to reach targeted locations and populations, due to poor Logistics Management Information System (LMIS). In a bid to contribute towards addressing these challenges, a pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the tracking ability, reliability and applicability of EASE App, a novel Smart Phone based Application. The App is designed to provide real-time tracking and tracing of commodities as well as curation of data in a cloud based database with restricted access which can be linked with other databases. In this study, NIPRIMAL was labelled with QR codes, and tracked within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria, using the smartphone based EASE App. Data collected showed that the "EASE App" tracking had accuracy of 100% for date and time of scan, operators' codes and product identity; and 92.83±1.69% and 99.83±0.27% accuracy for GPS mapping label for the city and country, respectively. The GPS mapping label for specific streets, roads or districts, gave an accuracy of about 64.28±3.14%. The technology was able to provide real-time data on user unique identity, user location as well as date/time of use, and the feedback report indicated that it was readily deployable and easy to use. The results demonstrate that the "EASE App" is a promising technology that can support supply chain and related data management challenges in resource poor settings. The potential benefit of the EASE App in strengthening LMIS and distribution chain system in Africa as well as future optimization of the App are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31314809 PMCID: PMC6636709 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Results of tracking of Niprimal using the EASE App.
| S/N | Item / Parameters | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mean Scans/QR code | 4.47±1.37 |
| 2 | % Accuracy of scans showing Nigeria | 99.83±0.27 |
| 3 | % Accuracy of scans showing Abuja | 92.83±1.69 |
| 4 | % Accuracy of scans showing Specific Streets/roads /district | 64.28±3.14 |
| 5 | % Accuracy for Date / Time of scan | 100.00±0.00 |
| 6 | % Accuracy for operator’s Identity (unique code) | 100.00±0.00 |
a standard deviation
b margin of error at 95% confidence limit
Sample size used in computation includes the total number of uploaded data which was 893
Fig 1Chart showing the proportion (as %) of scans that correctly identified Nigeria as location and those that did not.
Fig 2Chart showing the proportion (as %) of scans that correctly identified Abuja as location and those that did not.
Fig 3Chart showing the percentage success and failure of scanned QR codes showing specific location (streets/roads/districts).
Fig 4Chart showing the percentage location failure due from NIPRD and other areas outside NIPRD (combined).
Fig 5Tracking traceable to known areas (districts) in Abuja and environ excluding Idu/Karmo area (location of NIPRD).
Field feedback report.
| Scoring Criteria | % Feedback Report | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Login | Scanning | Upload | Number of Trials | Internet connectivity | |
| 61.5± 18.3 | 34.6± 18.7 | 30.8± 17.8 | - | - | |
| 38.5± 18.7 | 53.8± 19.2 | 43.6± 19.1 | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | 61.5± 18.3 | |
| - | - | - | 30.8± 17.8 | ||
| - | - | 20.5± 15.5 | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | 7.7 ± 10.3 | |
| - | 3.8± 7.4 | - | - | ||
| - | - | 5.1± 8.5 | - | - | |
| - | 7.7 ± 10.3 | - | - | - | |
| - | - | 61.5± 18.3 | - | ||
| - | - | 17.3± 14.5 | - | ||
| - | - | 13.4± 13.1 | - | ||
| - | - | 3.8 ±7.4 | - | ||
Key: Very easy (VE), easy (E), good (G), fair (F), difficult (D), Varies (V), poor (P), couldn’t upload (CU), couldn’t scan (CS), and not easy (NE)
Twenty six feedback reports were received and used in the analysis.