Sofie Rutsaert1, Ward De Spiegelaere2, Laura De Clercq1, Linos Vandekerckhove1. 1. HIV Cure Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 2. Department of Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for HIV-1 treatment is to administer triple antiretroviral therapy, but a shift to simplified regimens is being explored. Boosted darunavir monotherapy can be considered for patients who are for specific reasons not good candidates for dual or triple therapy. Still, a number of patients fail virologically or need to switch treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictive markers for those patients that are more likely to sustain virological control under monotherapy, virological and immunological markers were explored in HIV-1-positive patients that experienced virological failure on ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy in the PROTEA trial. METHODS: As a retrospective nested study of the PROTEA study (NCT01448707), we analysed 77 HIV-1-infected patients who were on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg monotherapy up to 96 weeks. Patients were appointed to three distinct cohorts based on viral loads (VLs): (i) undetectable VL after 96 weeks; (ii) very-low-level viraemia (5-39 copies/mL); and (iii) failing treatment. Total HIV-1 DNA, integrated HIV-1 DNA and 2-long terminal repeat circular HIV-1 DNA (2LTR circles) were measured in PBMCs at baseline, week 48 and week 96. RESULTS: Total HIV-1 DNA and integrated HIV-1 DNA at baseline differed significantly between patients who experienced virological failure on monotherapy (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Although a higher level of HIV-1 DNA was measured in failures, this marker by itself does not provide enough predictive value to prospectively predict virological failure in patients on monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1 reservoir markers correlate with therapy failure in ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy. However, their role as a predictive marker combined with other markers in a routine clinical setting should be further explored.
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for HIV-1 treatment is to administer triple antiretroviral therapy, but a shift to simplified regimens is being explored. Boosted darunavir monotherapy can be considered for patients who are for specific reasons not good candidates for dual or triple therapy. Still, a number of patients fail virologically or need to switch treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictive markers for those patients that are more likely to sustain virological control under monotherapy, virological and immunological markers were explored in HIV-1-positivepatients that experienced virological failure on ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy in the PROTEA trial. METHODS: As a retrospective nested study of the PROTEA study (NCT01448707), we analysed 77 HIV-1-infectedpatients who were on darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg monotherapy up to 96 weeks. Patients were appointed to three distinct cohorts based on viral loads (VLs): (i) undetectable VL after 96 weeks; (ii) very-low-level viraemia (5-39 copies/mL); and (iii) failing treatment. Total HIV-1 DNA, integrated HIV-1 DNA and 2-long terminal repeat circular HIV-1 DNA (2LTR circles) were measured in PBMCs at baseline, week 48 and week 96. RESULTS: Total HIV-1 DNA and integrated HIV-1 DNA at baseline differed significantly between patients who experienced virological failure on monotherapy (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Although a higher level of HIV-1 DNA was measured in failures, this marker by itself does not provide enough predictive value to prospectively predict virological failure in patients on monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS:HIV-1 reservoir markers correlate with therapy failure in ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy. However, their role as a predictive marker combined with other markers in a routine clinical setting should be further explored.
Authors: Katie Fisher; Xiao Qian Wang; Ashley Lee; Vincent Morcilla; Anneke de Vries; Eunok Lee; John-Sebastian Eden; Steven G Deeks; Anthony D Kelleher; Sarah Palmer Journal: J Virol Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Wouter A van der Heijden; Rosanne C van Deuren; Lisa van de Wijer; Inge C L van den Munckhof; Marloes Steehouwer; Niels P Riksen; Mihai G Netea; Quirijn de Mast; Linos Vandekerckhove; Richarda M de Voer; Andre J van der Ven; Alexander Hoischen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Anna L Fournier; Laurent Hocqueloux; Dominique L Braun; Karin J Metzner; Roger D Kouyos; François Raffi; Anaïs R Briant; Esteban Martinez; Elisa De Lazzari; Eugenia Negredo; Bart Rijnders; Casper Rokx; Huldrych F Günthard; Jean-Jacques Parienti Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 4.423
Authors: Shiran Shapira; Eynat Finkelshtein; Dina Kazanov; Esmira Naftali; Irena Stepansky; Abraham Loyter; Daniel Elbirt; Mori Hay-Levy; Eli Brazowski; Faina Bedny; Roy Dekel; Dov Hershkovitz; Arye Blachar; Ido Wolf; Nadir Arber Journal: Oncogene Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Wouter A van der Heijden; Lisa Van de Wijer; Farid Keramati; Wim Trypsteen; Sofie Rutsaert; Rob Ter Horst; Martin Jaeger; Hans Jpm Koenen; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Irma Joosten; Paul E Verweij; Jan van Lunzen; Charles A Dinarello; Leo Ab Joosten; Linos Vandekerckhove; Mihai G Netea; André Jam van der Ven; Quirijn de Mast Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2021-04-08
Authors: Maria Artesi; Vincent Hahaut; Basiel Cole; Linos Vandekerckhove; Anne Van den Broeke; Keith Durkin; Laurens Lambrechts; Fereshteh Ashrafi; Ambroise Marçais; Olivier Hermine; Philip Griebel; Natasa Arsic; Frank van der Meer; Arsène Burny; Dominique Bron; Elettra Bianchi; Philippe Delvenne; Vincent Bours; Carole Charlier; Michel Georges Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Lisa Van de Wijer; Wouter A van der Heijden; Rob Ter Horst; Martin Jaeger; Wim Trypsteen; Sofie Rutsaert; Bram van Cranenbroek; Esther van Rijssen; Irma Joosten; Leo Joosten; Linos Vandekerckhove; Till Schoofs; Jan van Lunzen; Mihai G Netea; Hans J P M Koenen; André J A M van der Ven; Quirijn de Mast Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 7.561