Literature DB >> 31313719

Evaluation of the Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. Web Portal.

Antoinette Percy-Laurry1, Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts, Wynne E Norton, Cheryl McDonnell, Annabelle Uy, David A Chambers.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. (P.L.A.N.E.T.) Web portal was designed to ease access to data and evidence-based resources for cancer control practitioners and researchers focused on developing, implementing, and evaluating cancer control programs.
OBJECTIVES: To determine usability, applicability, and opportunities to improve the P.L.A.N.E.T. Web portal after significant changes to the portal over time.
DESIGN: The National Cancer Institute surveyed and interviewed cancer control professionals to assess factors influencing utilization of P.L.A.N.E.T. Data were collected from May 2017 to June 2018 via partner agencies, electronic publications, and online links. OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics with χ test were used to analyze the quantitative data and examine the relationship among variables. Qualitative interviews further informed the quantitative analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 724 participants surveyed, 51% were users of P.L.A.N.E.T., with the majority accessing P.L.A.N.E.T. within the last 6 months. Most users felt that P.L.A.N.E.T. effectively met their needs for accessing specific cancer data, identifying evidenced-based programs, and ascertaining details on various cancer topics. There were statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between users and nonusers of P.L.A.N.E.T., where users were more likely to have more experience in the cancer field, were older in age, and located in southern states.
CONCLUSION: Results indicate that P.L.A.N.E.T. is seen as a viable and credible source for cancer control program planning and delivery. A reassessment of P.L.A.N.E.T.'s goals is warranted, which may support reaching out to new audiences, amplifying or removing underutilized resources, and adding additional resources and topics. Consideration for training and tutorials on P.L.A.N.E.T. would benefit partner agencies and build capacity for evidence-based program development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31313719      PMCID: PMC6954980          DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  10 in total

1.  Evolution of Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T.: moving research into practice.

Authors:  Michael A Sanchez; Cynthia A Vinson; Madeline La Porta; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Jon F Kerner; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Comprehensive cancer control: progress and accomplishments.

Authors:  Phyllis W Rochester; Julie S Townsend; Leslie Given; Hope Krebill; Sandra Balderrama; Cynthia Vinson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cancer control planners' perceptions and use of evidence-based programs.

Authors:  Peggy A Hannon; Maria E Fernandez; Rebecca S Williams; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Cam Escoffery; Matthew W Kreuter; Debra Pfeiffer; Michelle C Kegler; LeRoy Reese; Ritesh Mistry; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 May-Jun

4.  The implementation road: engaging community partnerships in evidence-based cancer control interventions.

Authors:  Erica S Breslau; Elisa S Weiss; Abigail Williams; Allison Burness; Deanna Kepka
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2014-04-03

Review 5.  What works to prevent adolescent smoking? A systematic review of the National Cancer Institute's Research-Tested Intervention Programs.

Authors:  Elyse J Sherman; Brian A Primack
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.118

6.  Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Arild Bjørndal; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Sølvi Helseth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comprehensive Cancer Control Partners' Use of and Attitudes About Evidence-Based Practices.

Authors:  C Brooke Steele; John M Rose; Julie S Townsend; Jamila Fonseka; Lisa C Richardson; Gary Chovnick
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Development of a Website Providing Evidence-Based Information About Nutrition and Cancer: Fighting Fiction and Supporting Facts Online.

Authors:  Merel Rebecca van Veen; Sandra Beijer; Anika Maria Alberdina Adriaans; Jeanne Vogel-Boezeman; Ellen Kampman
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-09-08

9.  Effect of an evidence-based website on healthcare usage: an interrupted time-series study.

Authors:  Wouter A Spoelman; Tobias N Bonten; Margot W M de Waal; Ton Drenthen; Ivo J M Smeele; Markus M J Nielen; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series.

Authors:  Cheryl B Stetler; Brian S Mittman; Joseph Francis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The S.P.A.C.E Hypothesis: Physical Activity as Medium - Not Medicine - for Public Health Impact.

Authors:  Eduardo Esteban Bustamante; Jared Donald Ramer; María Enid Santiago-Rodríguez; Tara Gisela Mehta; Andres Sebastian Bustamante; David X Marquez; Stacy Lynn Frazier
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.230

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.