| Literature DB >> 31313092 |
S R Friedman1,2, E R Pouget3, M Sandoval4, G K Nikolopoulos5, P Mateu-Gelabert6,7, D Rossi8, J D Auerbach9.
Abstract
Large-scale structural interventions and "Big Events" like revolutions, wars and major disasters can affect HIV transmission by changing the sizes of at-risk populations, making high-risk behaviors more or less likely, or changing contexts in which risk occurs. This paper describes new measures to investigate hypothesized pathways that could connect macro-social changes to subsequent HIV transmission. We developed a "menu" of novel scales and indexes on topics including norms about sex and drug injecting under different conditions, experiencing denial of dignity, agreement with cultural themes about what actions are needed for survival or resistance, solidarity and other issues. We interviewed 298 at-risk heterosexuals and 256 men who have sex with men in New York City about these measures and possible validators for them. Most measures showed evidence of criterion validity (absolute magnitude of Pearson's r ≥ 0.20) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70). These measures can be (cautiously) used to understand how macro-changes affect HIV and other risk. Many can also be used to understand risk contexts and dynamics in more normal situations. Additional efforts to improve and to replicate the validation of these measures should be conducted.Entities:
Keywords: Big events; HIV/AIDS; Measures development; Risk environments; Structural interventions
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31313092 PMCID: PMC6954343 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-019-02582-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165