Tiago Henrique de Souza1, José Antonio Hersan Nadal2, Andressa Oliveira Peixoto3, Ricardo Mendes Pereira1, Marina Pavan Giatti1, Ana Carolina Siqueira Soub1, Marcelo Barciela Brandão1. 1. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 1000, Hermantino Coelho St., Campinas, SP, 13087-500, Brazil. 2. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), 1000, Hermantino Coelho St., Campinas, SP, 13087-500, Brazil. jota.nadal@gmail.com. 3. Discipline of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the interoperator agreement of lung ultrasonography (LUS) on specific thoracic regions in children diagnosed with pneumonia and to compare the findings of the LUS with the chest X-ray. Participants admitted to the ward or PICU underwent LUS examinations performed by an expert and a novice operator. A total of 261 thoracic regions in 23 patients were evaluated. Median age and weight of participants were 30 months and 11.6 kg, respectively. A substantial overall agreement between operators was found for normal lung tissue (κ = 0.615, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.516-0.715) and for consolidations (κ = 0.635, 95% CI = 0.532-0.738). For B-lines, a moderate agreement was observed (κ = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.475-0.671). An almost perfect agreement was found for pleural effusion (κ = 0.868, 95% CI = 0.754-0.982). The diagnosis of consolidations by LUS showed a high sensitivity (93% for both operators) but a low specificity (14% for expert and 25% for novice operator). While intubated patients presented significantly more consolidations, nonintubated patients presented more normal ultrasound patterns. Conclusion: Even when performed by operators with very distinct degrees of experience, LUS had a good interoperator reliability for detecting sonographic patterns on specific thoracic regions. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound is feasible, safe, and highly accurate for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children; however, it does not allow global visualization of the thorax in a single moment as in chest X-rays, and, similar to the stethoscope, partial thorax assessments must be performed sequentially. What is New: • This is the first study evaluating the agreement of LUS on specific thoracic regions between operators with distinct degrees of experience performing the sonograms. • There is a good agreement between an expert operator and a novice operator who underwent a brief theoretical-practical training program on LUS.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the interoperator agreement of lung ultrasonography (LUS) on specific thoracic regions in children diagnosed with pneumonia and to compare the findings of the LUS with the chest X-ray. Participants admitted to the ward or PICU underwent LUS examinations performed by an expert and a novice operator. A total of 261 thoracic regions in 23 patients were evaluated. Median age and weight of participants were 30 months and 11.6 kg, respectively. A substantial overall agreement between operators was found for normal lung tissue (κ = 0.615, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.516-0.715) and for consolidations (κ = 0.635, 95% CI = 0.532-0.738). For B-lines, a moderate agreement was observed (κ = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.475-0.671). An almost perfect agreement was found for pleural effusion (κ = 0.868, 95% CI = 0.754-0.982). The diagnosis of consolidations by LUS showed a high sensitivity (93% for both operators) but a low specificity (14% for expert and 25% for novice operator). While intubated patients presented significantly more consolidations, nonintubated patients presented more normal ultrasound patterns. Conclusion: Even when performed by operators with very distinct degrees of experience, LUS had a good interoperator reliability for detecting sonographic patterns on specific thoracic regions. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound is feasible, safe, and highly accurate for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children; however, it does not allow global visualization of the thorax in a single moment as in chest X-rays, and, similar to the stethoscope, partial thorax assessments must be performed sequentially. What is New: • This is the first study evaluating the agreement of LUS on specific thoracic regions between operators with distinct degrees of experience performing the sonograms. • There is a good agreement between an expert operator and a novice operator who underwent a brief theoretical-practical training program on LUS.
Authors: Ryan L DeSanti; Eileen A Cowan; Pierre D Kory; Michael R Lasarev; Jessica Schmidt; Awni M Al-Subu Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Julia d'Hooghe; Haizea Alvarez Martinez; Pia Iben Pietersen; Christian B Laursen; Nicole Hersch; Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki; Simon Walsh; Jouke Annema; Daniela Gompelmann Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-07-20
Authors: Joanna Jaworska; Anna Komorowska-Piotrowska; Andrzej Pomiećko; Jakub Wiśniewski; Mariusz Woźniak; Błażej Littwin; Magdalena Kryger; Piotr Kwaśniewicz; Józef Szczyrski; Katarzyna Kulińska-Szukalska; Natalia Buda; Zbigniew Doniec; Wojciech Kosiak Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Anna Maria Musolino; Paolo Tomà; Cristina De Rose; Eugenio Pitaro; Elena Boccuzzi; Rita De Santis; Rosa Morello; Maria Chiara Supino; Alberto Villani; Piero Valentini; Danilo Buonsenso Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Manuel Sobrino Toro; José Luis Vázquez Martínez; Ricardo Viana Falcão; Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa; Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 2.990