| Literature DB >> 31312614 |
Yuqing Wu1,2, Jibo Jing1,2, Jinfeng Wang3, Bin Xu1, Mulong Du4,5, Ming Chen1.
Abstract
Objective: Newer technologies such as near-infrared (NIR) imaging of the fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) and daVinci Xi Surgical System have become promising tools for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. This meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic value of SLN in assessing lymph nodal metastasis in pelvic malignancies, using ICG with NIR imaging in robotic-assisted surgery. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: cancer; indocyanine green; pelvic; robotic surgery; sentinel lymph node
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312614 PMCID: PMC6614336 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Flow diagram of studies identified, included, and excluded.
Characteristics of included studies.
| Rossi et al. ( | 20 | Prospective | Endometrium/cervix | Cervical | 61 | 31 | 4.5 | 23.5 | Pelvic and para-aortic LND by guidelines | NR | 85.0% | 50.0% |
| Holloway et al. ( | 35 | Retrospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 63 | 33.1 | NR | NR | Complete pelvic and common-iliac LND, aortic LND in high-grade EC | H&E, IHC, ultrastaging | 100.0% | 90.0% |
| Manny et al. ( | 50 | Prospective | Prostate | Prostate | 66 | NR | NR | NR | Extended PLND | NR | 76.0% | 100.0% |
| Jewell et al. ( | 197 | Retrospective | Endometrium/cervix | Cervical | 60 | 30.2 | 3 | NR | Pelvic and para-aortic LND by guidelines | H&E, ultrastaging | 95.0% | NR |
| Manny et al. ( | 10 | Prospective | Bladder | Bladder | 71 | NR | NR | NR | Complete pelvic and peri-aortic LND | NR | 90.0% | 100.0% |
| Sinno et al. ( | 38 | Prospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 65 | 31.1 | 4.8 | NR | Complete pelvic and para-aortic LND if preoperative grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcoma | H&E, ultrastaging | 92.1% | 100.0% |
| Paley et al. ( | 123 | Prospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 63 | 32 | 3 | NR | Pelvic and peri-aortic LND if high risk | H&E | 96.7% | 100.0% |
| Ehrisman et al. ( | 20 | Retrospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 67 | 32.3 | 2 | 22 | Complete pelvic LND or Memorial Sloan Kettering algorithm | H&E | 90.0% | NR |
| Chennamsetty et al. ( | 20 | Prospective | Prostate | Prostate | 64 | NR | 5 | NR | Extended PLND | NR | 100.0% | NR |
| Beavis et al. ( | 31 | Retrospective | Cervix | Cervical | 43 | 26.5 | 4 | 14 | Complete pelvic LND, para-aortic LND at surgeon discretion | H&E, IHC, ultrastaging | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Hagen et al. ( | 108 | Prospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 66 | 27.5 | NR | NR | Surgeon-discretion LND or Memorial Sloan Kettering algorithm | H&E, ultrastaging | 96.0% | NR |
| Erikssion et al. ( | 56 | Retrospective | Endometrium/cervix | Cervical | 62 | 30.6 | 3 | NR | Memorial Sloan Kettering algorithm | H&E, ultrastaging | 95.0% | NR |
| Mendivil et al. ( | 87 | Retrospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 62 | 32.9 | 2 | NR | Complete pelvic LND, para-aortic LND if at high risk | H&E | 96.5% | NR |
| Harke et al. ( | 59 | Prospective | Prostate | Prostate | 64 | NR | 9 | 15 | Extended PLND | NR | 94.9% | 78.0% |
| Rajanbabu and Agarwal ( | 69 | Prospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 60 | 27.9 | 5 | NR | Pelvic and para-aortic LND by guidelines | H&E | 95.7% | 70.0% |
| Renz et al. ( | 90 | Retrospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 61 | 31 | 2 | 19 | Complete pelvic LND, para-aortic LND by guidelines | H&E | 88.0% | 83.3% |
| Rozenholc et al. ( | 46 | Prospective | Endometrium | Cervical | 64 | 45 | 2.4 | NR | Pelvic and para-aortic LND by guidelines | H&E, ultrastaging | 89.1% | 100.0% |
NR, not reported; H&E, hematoxylin-eosin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; BMI, body mass index; LND, lymph node dissection; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection.
Figure 2Forest plot of pooled overall detection rate and 95% CI in SLN mapping. CI, confidence interval; SLN, sentinel lymph node.
Figure 3Funnel plot of pooled detection rate and sensitivity. (A) Funnel plot of pooled overall detection rate. (B) Funnel plot of pooled sensitivity.
Figure 4Forest plot of pooled sensitivity of SLN detection and 95% CI in SLN mapping. CI, confidence interval; SLN, sentinel lymph node.
Figure 5SROC curve. AUC, area under SROC curve; Q* indicates the point at which sensitivity = specificity.
Univariate meta-regression of SLN detection rate and study characteristics.
| <60 | 0.94 (0.91–0.97) | 0.891 |
| ≥60 | 0.95 (0.93–0.97) | |
| Prospective | 0.94 (0.91–0.97) | 0.456 |
| Retrospective | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | |
| <63 | 0.95 (0.92–0.98) | 0.985 |
| ≥63 | 0.95 (0.92–0.98) | |
| <32 kg/m2 | 0.95 (0.92–0.97) | 0.475 |
| ≥32 kg/m2 | 0.96 (0.94–0.99) | |
| Uterus | 0.95 (0.94–0.97) | 0.561 |
| Urology | 0.91 (0.82–1.00) | |
CI, confidence interval; SLN, sentinel lymph node; BMI, body mass index.