| Literature DB >> 31312609 |
M F Irfan1, S M Z Hossain1, H Khalid1, F Sadaf1, S Al-Thawadi2, A Alshater1, M M Hossain3, S A Razzak3.
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to maximize bio-cement (CaCO3) production through a waste feedstock of cement kiln dust (CKD) as a source of calcium by deployment of microalgae sp. Chlorella kessleri. The effect of process parameters such as temperature, pH and time-intervals of microalgae cultivation, were set as criteria that ultimately subscribe to a process of optimization. In this regard, a single factor experiments integrated with response surface methodology (RSM) via central composite design (CCD) was considered. A quadratic model was developed to predict the maximum CaCO3 yield. A ceiling of 25.18 g CaCO3 yield was obtained at an optimal set of 23 °C, pH of 10.63 and day-9 of microalgae culture. Under these optimized conditions, maximum 96% calcium was extracted from CKD. FTIR, XRD and EDS analyses were conducted to characterize the CaCO3 precipitates. Compressive modes of mechanical testing seemed to hold conventional cement complimented by CaCO3 co-presence markedly superior to mere cement performance as far as compressive strength is concerned. The latter criterion exhibited further increase in correspondence with rise in cement to bio-cement ratio. This investigative endeavour at hand offers a simple pivotal platform on the basis of which a scale-up of microalgae-infested bio-cement production might be facilitated in conjunction with the added benefit of alleviation in environmental pollution through cement waste utilization.Entities:
Keywords: Bio-cement; CaCO3 precipitation; Microalgae; Optimization; Waste management
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312609 PMCID: PMC6609786 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used to: a) cultivate Chlorella kessleri and b) produce bio-cement.
Central composite design (CCD) for optimizing temperature and pH with experimental data and model prediction.
| No. of runs | Temperature (x1) coded level | pH (x2) coded level | Temperature actual level | pH actual level | CaCO3 precipitate (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental data | Model prediction | Error (%) | |||||
| 1 | 0 | −1.4142 | 29 | 6.37 | 3.29 | 2.25 | 31.64 |
| 2 | 1.41421 | 0 | 35 | 8.5 | 18.62 | 15.22 | 18.28 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 10 | 16.9 | 20.35 | 20.40 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | 25 | 10 | 11.28 | 12.43 | 10.17 |
| 5 | −1.41421 | 0 | 23 | 8.5 | 4.91 | 4.76 | 3.07 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 33 | 7 | 10.91 | 13.32 | 22.06 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 8.5 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 8.5 | 6.7 | 6.60 | 1.49 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | 25 | 7 | 6.34 | 6.45 | 1.68 |
| 10 | 0 | 1.41421 | 29 | 10.62 | 27.3 | 24.79 | 9.20 |
Fig. 2The CaCO3 precipitation with different temperature, pH and microalgae growth period. The initial pH for reaction mixture is (a) 7, (b) 9 and (c) 10, respectively.
Fig. 3Parity plot for bio-cement production.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for bio-cement yield.
| Term | Coefficient | SE Coefficient | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | – | – | 6.27 | 0.08 |
| Constants | 3.8378 | 2.887 | – | 0.276 |
| Block | 2.7623 | 1.415 | 3.81 | 0.146 |
| x1 | 3.6974 | 1.258 | 8.63 | 0.061 |
| x2 | 6.0152 | 1.275 | 22.25 | 0.018 |
| x1*x1 | 4.4564 | 2.074 | 4.61 | 0.121 |
| x2*X2 | 4.8402 | 1.747 | 7.68 | 0.07 |
| x1*x2 | 0.2625 | 1.78 | 0.02 | 0.892 |
Fig. 4Main effect (a) and interaction (b) plots for bio-cement yield.
Fig. 5Response optimizer plot for bio-cement yield. Here, d and D are individual and overall desirability functions of the response, respectively (ideal value of d or D = 1). Hi, Lo and Cur are high, low and current factors level (coded values) settings, respectively.
Fig. 6FTIR analysis of produced precipitates.
Fig. 7XRD pattern of (a) CKD sample (b) precipitate produced using microalgae.
Fig. 8EDX pattern of precipitate produced using microalgae.
Effect of conventional cement to biocement ratio on the compression strength.
| Cement / biocement ratio | Compressive strength (N/mm2) |
|---|---|
| 0:1 | – |
| 1:0 | 16 |
| 1:1 | 20 |
| 2:1 | 34 |
| 3:1 | 42 |