| Literature DB >> 31312271 |
H Hedelin1,2, P Larnert1,2, H Hebelka2,3, H Brisby1,2, K Lagerstrand2,4, T Laine1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Salter innominate osteotomy (SIO) in children is traditionally stabilized by Kirschner-wires, which have issues regarding stability, infection and the need to be extracted. To counter these disadvantages, we present a surgical method to stabilize SIO with modern resorbable poly lactic-co-glycolic acid screws. Using a case series of 21 patients treated with SIO for developmental dysplasia of the hip or Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease we evaluate the feasibility of the method.Entities:
Keywords: Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; absorbable implants; hip dysplasia; osteotomy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312271 PMCID: PMC6598047 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.180195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Patient characteristics. Ages are presented as median range
| All | LCPD | DDH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boys, n | 13 | 12 | 1 |
| Girls, n | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| Total, n | 21 | 13 | 8 |
| Age, yrs | 6.6 (3.6 to 11.2) | 7.1 (4.8 to 9.7) | 5.7 (3.6 to 11.2) |
| SIO and simultaneous proximal femur osteotomy, n | 7 | 7 | 0 |
LCPD, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip; SIO, Salter innominate osteotomy
Fig. 1Preoperative radiograph of five-year-old boy with developmental dysplasia of the hip (patient 20) featuring a steep acetabular index and insufficient coverage of the femoral head.
Fig. 4Radiograph six months postoperative. The acetabular coverage remains improved and the osteotomy has healed.
Pre- and postoperative measurements
| Acetabular index, ° | Reimer’s index, % | CE angle, ° | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Sex | Diagnosis | Preop | First postop | Second postop | Preop | First postop | Second postop | Preop | First postop | Second postop |
| 1 | M | LCPD | 16.0 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 39.0 | 25.0 | 35.0 | 2.5 | 9.4 | 10.7 |
| 2 | F | DDH | 27.8 | 9.3 | 11.3 | 14.0 | N/A | 0.0 | 16.4 | 37.0 | 37.8 |
| 3 | M | LCPD | 24.0 | 21.8 | 23.2 | 30.0 | 29.0 | 30 | 6.7 | 14.8 | 12.9 |
| 4 | M | LCPD | 12.9 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 34.0 | 17.0 | 16.0 | 15.8 | 24.6 | 27.6 |
| 5 | F | DDH | 24.0 | 16.1 | 17.9 | 23.0 | 9.0 | 17.0 | 16.4 | 25.2 | 20.8 |
| 6 | M | LCPD | 12.5 | 8.5 | 2.9 | 24.0 | 0.0 | 24.0 | 28.0 | 33.6 | 30.8 |
| 7 | M | LCPD | 12.8 | 8.2 | 5.6 | 27.0 | 8.0 | 11.0 | 23.4 | 28.0 | 35.7 |
| 8 | M | LCPD | 12.1 | 4.3 | -3.2 | 32.0 | N/A | 7.0 | 16.9 | N/A | 32.7 |
| 9 | M | LCPD | 14.9 | -1.4 | -8.9 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 18.2 | 38.4 | 36.9 |
| 10 | F | DDH | 26.7 | 10.7 | 7.6 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19.6 | 31.7 | 38.7 |
| 11 | F | DDH | 26.4 | 20.6 | 13.4 | 40.0 | 18.0 | 24.0 | 10.6 | 19.2 | 20.8 |
| 12 | M | LCPD | 7.6 | -1.20 | -1.4 | 21.0 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 19.8 | 25.7 | 28.9 |
| 13 | M | LCPD | 10.2 | 4.5 | 7.6 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 27.2 | 33.7 | 30.0 |
| 14 | F | DDH | 31.5 | 16.3 | 16.3 | 28.0 | 19.0 | 0.0 | 16.4 | 28.5 | 36.7 |
| 15 | M | LCPD | 27.0 | 17.3 | 15.8 | 36.0 | 22.0 | 19.0 | 10.6 | 16.1 | 22.7 |
| 16 | F | LCPD | 7.1 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 26.7 | 34.0 | 38.0 |
| 17 | M | LCPD | 18.2 | 2.5 | 7.3 | N/A | N/A | 37.0 | 8.7 | 23.6 | 12.8 |
| 18 | F | DDH | 16.2 | -0.4 | 0.5 | 28.0 | 21.0 | 14.0 | 17.0 | 27.8 | 37.3 |
| 19 | M | LCPD | 18.1 | 8.2 | 4.8 | 29.0 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 11.2 | 24.7 | 32.8 |
| 20 | M | DDH | 33.0 | 22.0 | 17.6 | 37.0 | 21.0 | 26.0 | 7.1 | 15.9 | 16.6 |
| 21 | F | DDH | 25.5 | 15.2 | 13.2 | N/A | N/A | 9.0 | N/A | N/A | 23.0 |
First and second postop measurements were performed within one week after surgery and after a minimum of 180 days, respectively. M, male; F, female; CE, centre-edge angle; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; LCPD, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip; N/A, suboptimal projections making reliable measurements difficult
Mean measurements for pre- and postoperative radiographs
| DDH | LCPD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AI, ° | Preoperative | 26.4 | 14.9 |
| Last postoperative | 12.2 | 5.4 | |
| Change | -14.2 | -9.5 | |
| CE angle, ° | Preoperative | 14.8 | 16.6 |
| Last postoperative | 29.0 | 27.1 | |
| Change | 14.2 | 10.5 | |
| Reimer’s index, % | Preoperative | 26.9 | 26.3 |
| Last postoperative | 11.3 | 18.5 | |
| Change | -15.6 | -7.8 |
Fig. 5Development of longitudinal measurements for the developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) group. (a) Showing predictable decline of acetabular index (AI), and (b, c) visualizing predictable increase in centre-edge (CE) angle and a decrease of Reimer’s migration percentage. There are no signs of instability in the osteotomy.
Fig. 6Development of longitudinal measurements for the Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) group. In (a) it can be noted that all patients have a predictable decline in acetabular index (AI), except for patient 3 (fall from bed). Patient 3 is marked with a dotted line, and stands out with an increase in acetabular index (AI), postoperatively visualizing a collapse of the osteotomy. There are no signs of instability in the osteotomy with the exception of patient 3. (b, c) The centre-edge (CE) angle and Reimer’s index also exhibit a predictable development with a slightly higher variation which is consistent with the LCPD diagnosis. The collapse of the osteotomy is not as clearly obvious for patient 3 in these parameters.