| Literature DB >> 31312227 |
M Leal1,2, Y M Pacheco1,3, I Herrero-Fernández1, I Rosado-Sánchez1, A I Álvarez-Ríos1,4, M I Galvá5, M De Luna-Romero1, S Sanbonmatsu-Gámez6, M Pérez-Ruiz6, J M Navarro-Marí6, A Carrillo-Vico1,7, B Sánchez8, R Ramos5, J Cañizares5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza virus infection is a significant cause of morbimortality in the elderly. However, there is poor vaccine efficacy in this population due to immunosenescence. We aimed to explore several homeostatic parameters in the elderly that could impact influenza vaccine responsiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Inflammation; Ki67; TREC; Thymic function; Treg
Year: 2019 PMID: 31312227 PMCID: PMC6612162 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-019-0154-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
Characterization of the study population. Comparisons between groups regarding the vaccine response to the influenza vaccine
| Variable | TOTAL | Non-Responders | Responders |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 79 [70–87] | 80 [67–88] | 77 [71–86] | 0.806 |
|
| 24 (40) | 15 (46) | 9 (33) | 0.340 |
| 799 [614–1103] | 715 [533–1236] | 825 [749–1008] | 0.281 |
| 473 [279–685] | 439 [159–671] | 486 [384–698] | 0.185 |
|
| 1.8 [1.2–2.3] | 1.9 [1.2–2.3] | 1.6 [1.1–2.7] | 0.704 |
|
| 32 [0–50] | 31 [0–55] | 34 [7–50] | 0.615 |
|
| 19 (32) | 12 (36) | 7 (27) | 0.441 |
|
| 25.4 [13.3–40.3] | 25.4 [12.4–39.0] | 24.6 [13.8–43.0] | 0.973 |
|
| 12.7 [10.2–14.1] | 13.0 [10.1–15.3] | 12.7 [11.4–13.5] | 0.564 |
|
| 2.8 [1.6–5.0] | 2.3 [1.2–4.8] | 3.1 [2.2–5.0] | 0.330 |
|
| 2.5 [2.1–3.5] | 2.7 [2.4–3.7] | 2.3 [2.0–3.3] | 0.156 |
|
| 705 [438–1183] | 875 [445–1425] | 620 [438–918] |
|
|
| 3.5 [2.4–4.6] | 3.4 [2.3–4.9] | 3.6 [2.6–4.5] | 0.691 |
|
| 1034 [844–1293] | 1034 [792–1224] | 1084 [878–1477] | 0.222 |
|
| 26.2 [23.2–33.1] | 24.9 [22.4–32.0] | 29.0 [25.0–34.1] |
|
|
| 6.5 [5.4–7.6] | 6.6 [5.4–7.9] | 6.5 [5.4–7.5] | 0.894 |
|
| 59.6 [54.1–65.7] | 62.8 [54.4–66.9] | 58.0 [52.4–62.5] |
|
|
| 0.2 [0.2–0.4] | 0.3 [0.2–0.4] | 0.2 [0.1–0.3] | 0.258 |
|
| 3.4 [2.2–4.2] | 3.2 [1.7–4.5] | 3.7 [3.2–4.2] |
|
|
| 223 [180–294] | 233 [181–294] | 197 [170–296] | 0.650 |
|
| 90.2 [86.1–93.6] | 90.6 [85.5–93.5] | 90.0 [86.6–95.1] | 0.876 |
|
| 9.4 [7.9–10.1] | 9.3 [7.8–10.3] | 9.40 [8.1–10.0] | 0.716 |
|
| 12 [6–22] | 14 [6–21] | 10 [6–24] | 0.921 |
|
| 117 [87–164] | 134 [88–166] | 113 [82–144] | 0.377 |
|
| 2.3 [1.6–2.9] | 2.6 [1.7–3.0] | 1.9 [1.5–2.4] |
|
|
| 3 [2–5] | 3 [2–5] | 3 [2–5] | 0.874 |
|
| 87 [70–100] | 85 [70–100] | 90 [70–100] | 0.838 |
|
| 3 (5) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (6.1) | |
|
| 2 (3.3) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (3) | |
|
| 5 (8.3) | 3 (11.5) | 2 (6.1) | |
|
| 32 (53.3) | 14 (53.8) | 18 (54.5) | |
|
| 18 (30) | 8 (29.6) | 10 (30.3) |
Continuous variables are expressed as median values [IQR], and categorical variables are expressed as the number of cases (%). Comparisons between the groups were made using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Variables with a p value < 0.1 are shown in italics. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are shown in bold. Note: CMV Cytomegalovirus, LBP Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein, hsCRP High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, B2M β2-microglobulin, sCD163 soluble CD163, MCV Mean corpuscular volume, MPV Mean platelet volume, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PLR Platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and NLR Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. (a) Thymic failure is defined as an sj/β TREC ratio < 10. bDetails of comorbidities recorded are shown in Additional file 5: Table S5. c100 is totally independent and < 20 is totally dependent
Fig. 1Characterization of Treg subsets in relation to the response to the influenza vaccine. a-d Frequencies of Treg subsets. e-h Frequencies of Treg subsets expressing the proliferation marker Ki67+. A total of 60 subjects, within an age range of 61–98 years old (min-max) and median age of 79 [70–87] (median [IQR]) were included. Comparisons between the groups of vaccine non-responders (n = 33) and responders (n = 27) were made using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are shown in bold. *After the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the comparison of % nTregKi67+ did not remain statistically significant. Note: nTreg, naïve-Treg; and eTreg, effector-Treg
Fig. 2Maturational subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing Ki67+. a-d Frequencies of CD4+ maturational subsets expressing the proliferation marker Ki67+. e-h Frequencies of CD8+ maturational subsets expressing the proliferation marker Ki67+. Comparisons between the groups of vaccine non-responders (n = 33) and responders (n = 27) were made using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are shown in bold. *After correction for multiple comparisons by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, applying a 10% FDR, all statistical significances remained. Note: CM, central memory; EM, effector memory; and TemRA, terminally differentiated effector memory
Fig. 3Correlations between the sj/β TREC ratio and inflammation-related biomarkers. a Correlation between sj/β TREC and D-dimers. b Correlation between sj/β TREC and the ESR. c) Correlation between sj/β TREC and the PLR. d Correlation between sj/β TREC and hsCRP. A total of 60 subjects. Correlations were assessed using Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient. Variables with a p value < 0.1 are shown in italics. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and are shown in bold. *After correction for multiple comparisons by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, applying a 10% FDR, all statistical significances remained. Note: ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PLR, platelets to lymphocyte ratio; and hsCRP, high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein