| Literature DB >> 31311943 |
Matteo Becatti1, Andrea Bencini2, Silvia Nistri3, Luca Conti4, Maria Giulia Fabbrini4, Laura Lucarini5, Veronica Ghini6, Mirko Severi4, Claudia Fiorillo1, Claudia Giorgi4, Lorenzo Sorace4, Barbara Valtancoli4, Daniele Bani7.
Abstract
Oxidative stress due to excessEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31311943 PMCID: PMC6635543 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46476-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Drawings of H2M2 and H2Q2.
Figure 2Synthetic procedure used for H2Q2 synthesis.
Stability constants of the H2M2 and H2Q2 complexes with MnII and other cations (NaI, MgII, CaII) and protonation constants of H2Q2 in aqueous solution (I = 0.1 M, 25 °C).
| Reaction | log | |
|---|---|---|
| Q22− + 2 H+ = H2Q2 | 20.97(3) | |
| H2Q2 + H+ = H3Q2+ | 6.67(8) | |
| H3Q2+ + H+ = H4Q22+ | 6.33(5) | |
| H4Q22+ + H+ = H5Q23+ | 4.23(6) | |
| H5Q23+ + H+ = H6Q24+ | 3.41(6) | |
| Mn2+ + M22− = [MnM2] | 14.73(2) | |
| [MnM2] + H+ = [Mn(HM2)]+ | 4.53(7) | |
| [Mn(HM2)]+ + H+ = [Mn(H2M2)]2+ | 3.96(2) | |
| Mn2+ + Q22− = [MnQ2] | 19.56(8) | |
| [MnQ2] + H+ = [Mn(HQ2)]+ | 4.50(2) | |
| [Mn(HQ2)]+ + H+ = [Mn(H2Q2)]2+ | 4.31(1) | |
| Na+ + L2− = [NaL]− | 2.08(7) | 2.40(3) |
| Mg2+ + L2− = [MgL] | 5.74(7) | 6.93(5) |
| Ca2+ + L2− = [CaL] | 7.67(8) | 8.94(4) |
Figure 3UV-vis spectra of H2Q2 (a) and absorbance measured at λ 316 nm in the presence of increasing amounts of MnII (aqueous solution, pH 7.4, [H2Q2 = 1.1·10−4 M]), and proposed structures of the MnM2 and MnQ2 complexes (in MnQ2 one or both quinoline moieties can be involved in metal coordination: only the case with both the quinoline units interacting with MnII is represented).
Figure 4Overall percentages of the H2M2 (a) and H2Q2 (b) complexed species with MnII, CaII MgII and NaI as a function of pH in competitive systems containing MnII (1 μM), CaII, (2.5 mM), MgII (1.5 mM) and NaI (165 mM) and H2M2 (1 μM) or H2Q2 (1 μM). Σ[Mn(HxQ2)]x+ = [MnQ2] + [Mn(HQ2)]+ + [Mn(H2Q2)]2+; Σ[Mn(HxM2)]x+ = [MnM2] + [Mn(HM2)]+ + [Mn(H2M2)]2+; [Σ[HxQ2](x − 2)+ = [Q2]2− + [HQ2]− +[H2Q2]− + [H3Q2]+ + [H4Q2]2+ + [H6Q2]4+; [Σ[HxM2](x − 2)+ = [M2]2− + [HM2]− + [H2M2] +[H3M2]+ + [H4M2]2+.
Figure 5Kinetic of decomposition by MnQ2 and MnM2 assayed spectrophotometrically (λ 550 nm) by inhibition of cytochrome c reduction. In the control experiment (black line), xanthine was converted to uric acid in about 150 s (max. absorbance: 0.09; vmax: 0.0021 arbitrary units, AU, s−1). The cytochrome c reduction kinetic changed substantially in the presence of 50 μM MnM2 (red line) (max. absorbance: 0.069; vmax: 0.000457 AU s−1) or 50 μM MnQ2 (purple line) (max absorbance: 0.072; vmax: 0.000460 AU s−1), with a substantially similar catalytic efficiency of MnQ2 and MnM2. ZnM2 (blue line) and ZnQ2 (green line), in which the functional MnII was replaced with redox-inert ZnII, did not induce any significant differences in respect to the control.
Figure 6Time-related permeation of MnQ2 and MnM2 into H9c2 cell fractions evaluated as intracellular Mn amounts. The pellet fraction contains mitochondria whereas the supernatant fraction corresponds to cytosol. Upon incubation with MnQ2 (10 μmol L−1), Mn rises steadily in both cell fractions since 30 min. Upon incubation with MnM2 (10 μmol L−1), Mn also rises steadily in the cytosolic fraction but shows a time-related increase in the mitochondrial fraction. In this fraction, Mn was significantly higher with MnQ2 than with MnM2 at every time point. ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA).
Figure 7FACS analysis of intracellular ROS by H2DCFDA (a), of mitochondrial production by MitoSOX (b) and of cellular lipid peroxidation by BODIPY-581/591-C11, evaluated at 1 h (open columns) and 2 h (striped columns) and expressed as percent changes of the untreated controls. All these parameters were enhanced upon H + R and significantly reduced by MnQ2 and MnM2. At the shorter time point (1 h), MnQ2 was significantly more effective than MnM2. ***p < 0.001 vs. controls, MnM2 and MnQ2; (one-way ANOVA); #p < 0.05, n.s. not significant vs. MnM2 (Student’s t test).
Figure 10Representative confocal micrographs of H9c2 cells at the noted experimental conditions, examined after 1 h reoxygenation. Magnification, ×500.
Figure 8FACS analysis of mitochondrial activity by RSZ (a), of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ) by TMRM (b) and of mitochondrial transition pore opening (mPTP) by extinction of calcein fluorescence, evaluated at 1 h (open columns) and 2 h (striped columns) and expressed as percent changes of the untreated controls. All these parameters were decreased by H + R and significantly increased by MnM2 and MnQ2. At the shorter time point (1 h), MnQ2 was more effective than MnM2. ***p < 0.001 vs. controls, MnM2 and MnQ2; (one-way ANOVA); #p < 0.05, n.s. not significant vs. MnM2 (Student’s t test).
Figure 9FACS analysis of fluorescent reporter activity of apoptosis initiator caspases 8 (a) and 9 (b), of apoptosis effector caspase 3 (c) and of cell death assayed by LDH release (d), evaluated at 1 h (open columns) and 2 h (striped columns) and expressed as percent changes of the untreated controls. Caspase 8, involved in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, was unaffected by any treatment and exposure times. Conversely, caspase 9, involved in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, was increased by H + R and significantly decreased by MnQ2 and MnM2. Caspase 3 and overall cell death were increased by H + R and significantly decreased by MnQ2 and MnM2. At the shorter time point (1 h), MnQ2 was significantly more effective than MnM2 to reduce cell death. ***p < 0.001 vs. controls, MnM2 and MnQ2; (one-way ANOVA); #p < 0.05, n.s. not significant vs. MnM2 (Student’s t test).
Figure 11FACS analysis of immunofluorescent expression of phosphorylated (p−) JNK (a) p38 (b) and ERK1/2 (c), evaluated at 1 h and expressed as percent changes of the untreated controls. The oxidative stress-related MAPKs p-JNK and p-p38 were increased by H + R and significantly decreased by MnQ2 and MnM2. Conversely, the cytoprotective pERK was decreased by H + R and significantly increased by MnQ2 and MnM2, the former compound being significantly more effective than MnM2. ***p < 0.001 vs. controls; +p < 0.05, ++p < 0.01 vs. H + R; (one-way ANOVA); #p < 0.05 vs. MnM2 (Student’s t test).